Cover Image: August 2006 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

The Expert Mind [Preview]

Studies of the mental processes of chess grandmasters have revealed clues to how people become experts in other fields as well















Share on Tumblr

EFFORTFUL STUDY

EFFORTFUL STUDY is the key to achieving success in chess, classical music, soccer and many other fields. New research has indicated that motivation is a more important factor than innate ability. Image: ETHAN HILL

A man walks along the inside of a circle of chess tables, glancing at each for two or three seconds before making his move. On the outer rim, dozens of amateurs sit pondering their replies until he completes the circuit. The year is 1909, the man is Jos¿ Ra¿l Capablanca of Cuba, and the result is a whitewash: 28 wins in as many games. The exhibition was part of a tour in which Capablanca won 168 games in a row.

How did he play so well, so quickly? And how far ahead could he calculate under such constraints? "I see only one move ahead," Capablanca is said to have answered, "but it is always the correct one."


This article was originally published with the title The Expert Mind.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. HintonBR 08:53 PM 11/21/07

    Fantastic information. It would have been nice to represent a differing opinion for balance, but the data and analysis certainly raises some interesting points to consider as we look at educating/training people.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Aravindakumar,N 02:39 PM 11/27/07

    GoodChess player can play by Intution. Intution can be described as below:

    Knowledge = n* practice
    Intelligence= correct use of knowledge.
    Wisdom = Intelligent use of knowledge
    Intution = knowledge*Intelligence*wisdom

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. the_thinker 03:52 PM 1/10/08

    Those who are interested by the topic addressed in this article will be fascinated by Malcolm Gladwell's latest book: Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Talent-Talk.com 04:38 AM 5/25/08

    I think this is an interesting article but the study is flawed because no attempt has been made to define or describe natural ability or innate talent.

    Inventory the participants innate abilities, using a process such as Highlands, then come back and write the article again with a more reliable benchmark.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Jayhorn 11:29 AM 12/3/11

    This is a trick :) He simply makes a move, observes his opponents move, and then on the next table makes that move against his new opponent.

    Derren Brown, British magician and illusionist extraordinaire, did this with 20 British Grandmasters and beat ALL of them, imitating the fellow GM's moves. It was basically like Grandmaster vs Grandmaster

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Booksy 08:04 PM 12/30/11

    @Jayhorn:
    Obviously Derren Brown did not 'beat' ALL of them - that would be impossible if they are being played one against another. For every game he 'won', he would also 'lose' one, because he is playing two halves of the same game, and therefore would never be able to win more than half the games. In fact, if I recall, there were only a handful of GMs, along with an assortment of lesser masters, and one amateur who was president of some university chess club (which may sound impressive to a layman but has no bearing on chess playing ability). Derren Brown acheived a plus score in the trick by playing the masters against each other and beating the weaker player himself. A better magic trick would be to get 20 British GMS in the same room, as I don't think even the British Championship can manage that.

    As for Capablanca, and any other Grandmaster who ever gave a simultaneous display, this trick does not apply (nor would the grandmaster want to use it anyway) as the grandmaster always plays white in every game, making it impossible to play one player against another.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

The Expert Mind: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X