Cover Image: May 2010 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

140-Character Study: What if Everyone Had Always Been on Twitter at the Same Time?

Here is what might happen if the science greats "tweeted."















Share on Tumblr



BRIGHT TALK: What would the inventor of calculus have to say to the author of general relativity...in a tweet? Image: Twitter

Have you joined the Twitterverse? All over the world millions of people are posting their 140-or-­fewer-character tweets online via Twitter. As a confirmed Twitterer, I wondered what it might have been like if Twitter, and all its users, had been around for, oh, the past few thousand years.

PythyinGreece Had amazing insight into right triangles. Add squares of sides = square of hypo. Could be useful.

Euclidmenot Working on something (book series called Elements) to drive 10th graders nuts 4 thousands of years. Conic section alone will make them cry.

Aristophanesridiculous @Euclidmenot Conic section? I thought you said COMIC section. HaHA, I still got it! Hey, frogs are funny, yes?

Arkymeets Note to self: take more baths. Do some of my best thinking in the tub.

Galiheyo You know what moves when they show you the torture instruments? Your colon. I’m gonna be ixnay on the eetstway for an ilewhay.

Libnits Made way to figure out area under a curve by dividing into smaller and smaller sections until width of each disappears, call it calculus.

AppleNewt @Libnits You made that up? You couldn’t make up a bedtime story for a 2-yr-old. Making a kid, BTW, sounds disgusting.

Libnits @AppleNewt Keep sitting under trees, maybe something big will fall on you next time. 

AppleNewt @Libnits Apple falls near you, best idea you have is “Ooh, let’s make applesauce.”

HairyAlbert @AppleNewt Pick on somebody your own size. Btw, your gravity’s wrong. Just a teeny bit most of the time, but hey. @Euclidmenot You too.

Euclidmenot @HairyAlbert Prove it.

OzAScarecrow @PythyinGreece The sum of the square roots of any two sides of an isosceles triangle is = to the square root of the remaining side!

Mendelayoff @Euclidmenot Calling my thing Periodic Table of the Elements. Different elements from yours. OK?

Euclidmenot @Mendelayoff We’re like two lines that go next to each other for infinity but don’t ever touch.

PythyinGreece @OzAScarecrow So very wrong, but congrats on the degree. At least you’re failing upward.

AppleNewt @PythyinGreece You can’t fall upward.

HairyAlbert @Euclidmenot Two lines that never touch? Those lines are gonna touch, trust me.
ChuckinDown Worms and barnacles again today. I don’t feel so good.

PythyinGreece @AppleNewt I said he was FAILing upward, not falling upward. You’re doing too much alchemy, get fresh air.

HairyAlbert @Mendelayoff I’ll take number 99 on your table.

AlfieWallace @ChuckinDown Are you eating the worms and barnacles? Hey, did you get the package I sent?

ChuckinDown @AlfieWallace Yes, got package. Adding to my tummy troubles. We need to talk.

Curieous Went through thousands of pounds of pitchblende to get a speck of radium. I hate pitchblende.

InAHuff It snowed in DC, which proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that there is no global warming. I rest my case.

Beefranklin @InAHuff I risked my life in electrical storms for guys like you?

Bigstick99 @HairyAlbert Hey, I’m also number 99. There’s a lot of interesting physics in ice hockey.

InAHuff @Bigstick99 But the hockey stick is broken!

Beefranklin @InAHuff Seriously, you’re embarrassing us.

HairyAlbert @Bigstick99 I prefer elevator races.

SJGould I’m supposed to say something in 140 characters? That’s ludicrous. It’s absurd. It’s beyond ridiculous. In fact, it’s impossible. What idio



Rights & Permissions

20 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. tovX 08:37 AM 4/23/10

    JimAlEwing @HairyAlbert E's McTwo

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. tovX 08:38 AM 4/23/10

    JimAlEwing @HairyAlbert E's McTwo

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. benonemusic 09:01 AM 4/23/10

    Great piece! I also appreciated your reference to the Odd Couple episode in which Felix and Oscar were on the Password game show (Aristophanes=Ridiculous)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. weltschmerz 10:31 AM 4/23/10

    Yeah, nice one. But you're missing an important fact. 99.999% percent of tweets are completely irrelevant to human history, and 99.9% of tweeters are people who just don't matter. Most real scientists don't tweet on their findings like that. I know you know that, but I just don't like Tweeter being given an importance it clearly doesn't have and will never have.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. quantumgravity666 11:47 AM 4/23/10

    One of your finest pieces. You could put in something like the following.
    Plancksalot @ hairy albert: did you get my packet (In reference to the fundamental notion of quantum of energy Max Planck came up with in 1900).
    But it still is the most elegant burlesque of Twitter.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. galaxy_man 01:49 PM 4/23/10

    LikeAShroed @ Plancksalot: Have you seen my cat?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. nolsen311 in reply to weltschmerz 02:04 PM 4/23/10

    @weltschmerz
    You're missing an important fact: 99.9% of Human History is irrelevant to human history.

    Twitter is just a tool, don't disparage just because you don't see any use for it. So what? Don't use it.

    Great article...but a real pain to view on the Droid. The pop-over subscription ad really gets in the way and isn't easy to close.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. danshil 12:53 AM 4/24/10

    Fun article. Loved the Gretzky reference.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. danshil 12:53 AM 4/24/10

    Fun article. Loved the Gretzky reference.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. HowDidYouGetThere 05:54 AM 4/24/10

    Brilliant - you're the Master of the Universe for laugh out loud comedy that manages to by-pass all gastric bodily functions, and make its way to the neuro-circuitry.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. biggus56 05:58 AM 4/24/10

    I don't know which made me smile more: the article, or my embarrassment at spending *far* too long working out who OzAScarecrow is... I'm just glad I didn't try to prove his "theorem".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. quantumgravity666 11:40 AM 4/24/10

    hairy albert@ likeashroed: It is very fuzzy, much like my hair. I'm off to be the head of Israel. Aaaah, Nazi's!

    @galaxy_man: you could call him 'likeashroedingstone'.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  13. 13. Tupars 04:38 PM 4/25/10

    Very similar thing here: http://www.phdcomics.com/comics/archive.php?comicid=1198

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  14. 14. Dr_PO 02:01 AM 4/29/10

    I wrote this a couple of months ago on the same theme http://thirdopinion.nu/2010/01/twitter-philosophy/

    /P.O.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  15. 15. Vagrantseeker 01:11 PM 5/3/10

    Brilliant. Loved the "let's make applesauce" line. And wow, there's SJGould too. :)


    I'm confused which Plancksalot one I like more. @quantumgravity666 @galaxy_man :P

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  16. 16. Lucian 03:23 PM 5/3/10

    Love it. A shot the Huffington Post, too. "seriously, you're embarrassing us." hahaha

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  17. 17. MensaJeff in reply to weltschmerz 10:06 PM 5/3/10

    "People who just don't matter"?
    Wow. Is there still room in your fan club? Oh, I'll bet you have SO many friends already.

    I wish I could be like you, so I could do the right thing and kill myself.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  18. 18. sueksen in reply to weltschmerz 06:34 PM 5/7/10

    99.9% of tweeters are people that don't matter?? I'm not a tweeter . . . do you have a rate of importance on non tweeters?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  19. 19. PeteRonai in reply to weltschmerz 05:58 PM 6/22/10

    @Weltschmerz
    Don't you know that 99.999% of statistics are erroneous?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  20. 20. PeteRonai in reply to weltschmerz 06:04 PM 6/22/10

    @Weltschmerz
    Don't you know that 99.999% of statistics are erroneous?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

140-Character Study: What if Everyone Had Always Been on Twitter at the Same Time?: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X