More from the Magazine
July
2002 Issue- Profile Keeping the Mad Cows at Bay
- In Brief In Brief
- Innovations Breaking the Mold
- Buy the Digital Edition
More from this In-Depth Report
- Features Evolving Creationism in the Classroom
- Features Creationism Controversy: State-by-State [Map]
- Features Should Science Speak to Faith?
- From the In-Depth Report Creationism Vs. Evolution
When Charles Darwin introduced the theory of evolution through natural selection 143 years ago, the scientists of the day argued over it fiercely, but the massing evidence from paleontology, genetics, zoology, molecular biology and other fields gradually established evolution's truth beyond reasonable doubt. Today that battle has been won everywhere--except in the public imagination.
Embarrassingly, in the 21st century, in the most scientifically advanced nation the world has ever known, creationists can still persuade politicians, judges and ordinary citizens that evolution is a flawed, poorly supported fantasy. They lobby for creationist ideas such as "intelligent design" to be taught as alternatives to evolution in science classrooms. As this article goes to press, the Ohio Board of Education is debating whether to mandate such a change. Some antievolutionists, such as Philip E. Johnson, a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley and author of Darwin on Trial, admit that they intend for intelligent-design theory to serve as a "wedge" for reopening science classrooms to discussions of God.
Read Comments (2278) | Post a comment




