Cover Image: January 2001 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

2001: A Scorecard

How close are we to building HAL? I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid we can't do that















Share on Tumblr

Meanwhile Clarke, ensconced in his Sri Lankan home, has begun to experience an onslaught of press inquiries. "2001 is rearing its ugly head," he says. "I'm absolutely bombed out of my mind with interviews and TV." (George Orwell, who died in 1950, probably would have been glad that he never lived to see January 1, 1984.) On the morning of November 8, Clarke, 83, who suffers from a progressive neurological condition that prevents him from walking, had already received 10 e-mails, most from journalists requesting interviews. At the time, Clarke was preparing to put on scuba gear (something he not done in several years) so that he could be photographed in a local swimming pool by noted photojournalist Peter Menzel for the German magazine Stern. Asked if he regrets putting "2001" in the title of the screenplay, Clarke replies, "I think it was Stanley's idea."

In any case, Clarke remains undeterred by how far off the mark his vision has strayed. Machine intelligence will become more than science fiction, he believes, if not by the year marked on the cover of this magazine. "I think it's inevitable; it's just part of the evolutionary process," he says. Errors in prediction, Clarke maintains, get counterbalanced over time by outcomes more fantastic than the original insight. "First our expectations of what occurs outrun what's actually happening, and then eventually what actually happens far exceeds our expectations."

Quoting himself (Clarke's third law), Clarke remarks that "any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic; as technology advances it creates magic, and [AI is] going to be one of them." Areas of research that target the ultimate in miniaturization, he adds, may be the key to making good minds. "When nanotechnology is fully developed, they're going to churn [artificial brains] out as fast as they like." Time will tell if that's prediction, like Clarke's speculations about telecommunications satellites, or just a prop for science fiction.ý



This article was originally published with the title 2001: A Scorecard.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

2001: A Scorecard: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X