Cover Image: July 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

50 Years Ago: Nuclear War Planning















Share on Tumblr



Image: Scientific American

More In This Article

July 1962

Nuclear War Planning “The May 31 issue of The New England Journal of Medicine considers in detail the consequences of the 20 megatons scheduled for Boston in a nuclear attack scenario: ‘It is likely that the vectors of epidemic disease would survive radiation injury better than the human population. Eastern equine encephalitis, hepatitis, poliomyelitis and other endemic disease could easily reach epidemic proportions under these circumstances.’ Prompt disposal of the dead will be essential for ‘control of epidemic disease and its vectors, flies and rodents’ and for ‘equally important, though less apparent,’ psychological reasons. Citing a study by the Office of Civil Defense Mobilization, the authors concur in the view that ‘the demolished city must be fenced in or cordoned and placed under quarantine.’”

Shark Danger “Data from recent experiments may serve to remind bathers, skin divers, small-boat sailors and others who venture into the ocean that there is as yet no sure protection from sharks in open water. It has long been suspected that sharks possess a remarkable ability to locate their prey, often at a considerable distance. Study has accordingly been focused on the sensory organs [see photograph] that direct their predatory behavior. —Perry W. Gilbert”

July 1912

Artificial Wave Pool “Probably no feature of the International Hygiene Exposition held in Dresden last year attracted more general interest than the Undosa artificial surf bath. The receipts from the sale of bath tickets [about six cents apiece] were unexpectedly large, amounting sometimes to $450 in a single day. It is evident that the artificial surf bath may be made a very profitable as well as a very beneficial institution. All persons may derive benefit from the massage effected by the moving water.”

For an image of these baths and a slide show on the emergence of leisure time, a moneyed middle class and consumer technology, see www.ScientificAmerican.com/jul2012/leisure

Daring Feats “Among the well-known vaudeville entertainers must be mentioned Mr. Harry Houdini, whose celebrated feats with handcuffs, strait-jackets and various restraints used to confine the insane and fractious are well known. On Sunday, July 7th, Mr. Houdini invited a party of newspaper men and those interested in magic, to witness a very remarkable box-trick on New York Bay. The box, in which Houdini was ‘packed for export’ was dumped into the water. In exactly a minute and ten seconds Houdini emerged from the water, swimming toward the lifeboat which had been provided. The act was witnessed by thousands of spectators who crowded the decks of three ferryboats.”

Collisions at Sea “The wreck of the ‘Titanic’ was a severe and painful shock to us all; many of us lost friends and acquaintances by this dreadful catastrophe. I asked myself: ‘Has Science reached the end of its tether? Is there no possible means of avoiding such a deplorable loss of life and property? Thousands of ships have been lost by running ashore in a fog, hundreds by collisions with other ships or with icebergs, nearly all resulting in great loss of life and property.’ At the end of four hours it occurred to me that ships could be provided with what might be appropriately called a sixth sense, which would detect large objects in their immediate vicinity. —Sir Hiram Maxim”

Maxim's concept anticipated SONAR.

July 1862

Rabies Danger “The most effectual means of preventing dogs biting, and thereby communicating the disease, seems to be muzzling them. M. Renault, the distinguished veterinarian, states that the assertion that muzzling dogs, by the constraint it produces, is itself a cause of rabies, is utterly unsupported by any well-established facts. On the other hand, he points out the results which have been obtained in Berlin. When in 1854 the muzzling was ordered and strictly executed upon all dogs not tied up, the Berlin Veterinary School verified from 1854 to 1861 only nine cases have occurred, and none of these since 1856.”



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Jazzism 10:22 PM 7/1/12

    "Study has accordingly been focused on the sensory organs [see photograph] that direct their predatory behavior. —Perry W. Gilbert”"

    There's no photograph to speak of.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. SuperString 07:24 AM 7/2/12

    "Maxim's comment anticipated SONAR"
    I disagree; it would seem to me that regarding the text and the content of Sir Hiram's statement he might be anticipating RADAR instead.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Wicksteed 08:09 AM 7/2/12

    They had the wrong idea according to the WHO. Efforts to dispose of corpses actually detract from more important disaster relief efforts. But it's something people simply have to do, really.

    WHO: Corpses pose little threat

    http://articles.cnn.com/2004-12-29/world/quake.corpses_1_mass-burials-authorities-rush-bodies?_s=PM:WORLD

    AND

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Health_risks_from_dead_bodies

    It's only the psychological reason that actually justifies it, something which encompasses the very strong smell also.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

50 Years Ago: Nuclear War Planning: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X