Cover Image: February 2013 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

A Dangerous Game: Some Athletes Risk Untested Stem Cell Treatments

Some professional athletes' enthusiasm for certain stem cell treatments outpaces the evidence















Share on Tumblr

The ebbing summer of 2012 found Nitkowski working on a new sidearm delivery with a Minor League Mets team, still hoping to return to the Majors as a 40-year-old in 2013. Meanwhile the professional story of Colón, now an Oakland Athletic, entered a darker chapter on August 22, 2012, rendering his experiment with stem cells moot. The 39-year-old's season ended that day when Major League Baseball officials suspended him for 50 games—because he tested positive for the performance-enhancing drug synthetic testosterone. On November 3 the Oakland A's gave Colón a $3-million, one-year contract extension, which begins as soon as his suspension ends.



This article was originally published with the title A Dangerous Game.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Deborah Franklin is based in San Francisco and has reported on science and medicine for NPR, the New York Times, Fortune and Health Magazine.


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. priddseren 04:17 PM 1/16/13

    So what. If an athlete is going to cheat and enhance his body with a variety of drugs or other methods involving chemistry, he deserves to suffer any consequences that result from it. If he doesnt want his body screwed up by steroids or drugs, then dont do it. There is no reason to have any sort of sympathy for these people if they do this to themselves. It doesnt matter what the coach is saying or whomever, it is not hard to figure out that sports success comes from training and if you go beyond that, it is going to cause problems.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. SteveZit 06:10 PM 1/22/13

    Yeah... that's a dangerous game. You know what's more dangerous? CHESS!!! You don't get axed after injecting yourself with stem cells, do you? Chess, however, is a whole different story - http://sports-facts.top5.com/chess-kills!-unbelievable-causes-of-death-while-playing-chess/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. CVJones 11:40 AM 1/24/13

    This article is irresponsibilty one-sided, parading a deceptive caution without stating the strong case for continuing use of stem cell therapies in cases where other techniques fail - short of surgery. It might be helpful, for example, to note that Dr. Tuan, quoted in the article is co-editor with Dr. O'Brien of an important new journal. Dr. O'Brien states that,

    "Stem cells have enormous potential for alleviating suffering for many diseases which currently have no effective therapy. The field has progressed to the clinic and it is important that this pathway is underpinned by excellent science and rigorous standards of clinical research. The journal provides an important avenue of publication in translational aspects of stem cell therapy spanning preclinical studies, clinical research and commercialization."


    Prof. Timothy O'Brien,
    Editor-in-Chief
    Stem Cell Research & Therapy

    Ms. Franklin also might be more helpful if she took the time to inquire into the "potential problems" of the standard therapies, to wit:

    Surgical Complications

    Knee replacement surgery is a major surgery and therefore has potential complications. The most common serious complications from this surgery are infection, wound healing problems, deep-vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism. Serious infections of the newly replaced joint can require additional surgery and even removal of the replacement joint. Even once these infections heal, they may result in damage to the new joint that leads to ongoing problems with pain and loosening of the joint. A study by Frosch showed that 23.6% knee replacement surgeries had some complication and that a revision operation was required in 5.6% of the cases. The most common complication in this study was delayed wound healing.

    Long Term Satisfaction

    Success rates of knee replacement surgery are usually measured by how many patients have revisions of the initial surgery. But many patients who have had joint replacement end up with joints that still cause them pain and problems, but live with the symptoms instead of having a revision surgery performed.

    Studies that have looked at patients' expectations for knee replacement surgery have found that patients expect to be pain free and have great mobility of their knee joint after surgery. They expect to be able to return to all their old activities at the level of participation they had before they began having knee problems.

    The reality is different than patient expect. A study by Mannion showed that 85% of patients expected to be pain-free after surgery, but only 43% were. 52% of patients expected to by unlimited in their usual activities, but only 20% actually were. When this group of patients was asked if they could go back in time and make the decision over again to do the surgery would they do it? - 73.9% said yes definitely, 18.9% said yes probably, 6.3% said no probably not, and 0.9% said no definitely not.

    Another study by Nilsdotter found that 98% of patients expected much less or less pain postoperatively. At 1 year, 93% were experiencing much less or less pain, but by 5 years only 63% were experiencing much less or less pain than before surgery. In this same group, 96% expected their daily activity function to be better and 72% expected their sports and recreation function to be better. Daily activity levels were better for 90% at one year and 61% at 5 years, while sports and recreation function was better for only 25% at 1 year and 32% at 5 years.

    Age also plays a role in functional results. A study by Elson and Brenkel showed that patients younger than 60 years old at the time of surgery were more than twice as likely to report poor pain scores at 5 years after the surgery as patient who were over 60 years old. A study by Singh found that patients younger than 60 years old were more likely to have moderate to severe pain 2 years after surgery than patients who were 61 to 70 years old.

    A study by Price in patients under 60 years old found the 12 year survival rate was 82% when you considered revision surgery a failure. But when you looked at functional outcome or pain as the endpoint, the survival rate at 12 years was only 59%.

    Obesity and Knee Replacement

    Obesity is a rising problem in the United States and the world. Patients who are obese put more stress on their knees and are more likely to have knee problems. Obesity creates several problems for patients who have knee replacement surgery. A study by Samson showed that obese patients have a higher rate of knee replacement surgical complications than non-obese patients. They found a 3 to 9 times higher rate of infection in the obese patients. Additionally, they found that although obese patients might expect that their mobility would increase after surgery and that therefore they might lose weight, in fact, these patients did not tend to lose weight after surgery thereby continuing to put additional stress on their new joint.

    Obese patients wear out their replacement joints more quickly and are more likely to need revision surgery. A study by Amin showed that obese patients had a higher risk of complications than non-obese patients (32% of patients compared to 0%) and a higher failure rate at 3 years (27.7% of patients compared to 2.4%). Another study by Vazquez-Vela Johnson looked at patients 10 years after surgery. The overall survival rate was 96.8% at 14 years. However, the worst performing groups was a group of obese men less than 60 years old who had a 10-year survival rate of only 35.7%.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. stringingalongfunds 01:45 PM 4/4/13

    Untested??? The article is completely wrong with its facts. First of all, there have been US clinics that have published their findings with stem cell treatments since 2008, especially the treatments mentioned in this article. It is a legit medical procedure that helps repair many injured athletes. The author's due diligence on finding all the facts before writing this article is the only untested thing here.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. lungieboy 07:42 AM 4/13/13

    Due diligence....it should be a crime when someone in authority or looked at with any level of experience writes an "article" claiming knowledge or authority and yet IGNORES the act of due diligence....use it next time and wipe the egg off your face now, author of this misleading article. Go to pubmed.gov type in adipose derived adult stem cells and see the THOUSANDS of studies being performed as we speak....oh yeah, remember this doc, as you probably think that our country is the first and best with tech & medicine...we are 27th in the world...so maybe get your info from the ones that are actually DOING, instead of parroting the words that others say from the articles you lift your words from...this article is likened to a game of "telephone"....the real message has become distorted.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

A Dangerous Game: Some Athletes Risk Untested Stem Cell Treatments: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X