SLIDESHOW: Quantum Erasing in the Home, and other web extras for this article" data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">
BY REMOVING INFORMATION about things that have happened, a quantum eraser seemingly influences past events. In a fanciful example, a cat may have scampered around both sides of a tree at once if information about which way it went is later erased.
SLIDESHOW: Quantum Erasing in the Home, and other web extras for this article
Image: MATT COLLINS
More In This Article
-
Infographic
What you will need for the experiment
-
Infographic
What polarizers do to photons
-
Sidebar
How a Quantum Eraser Works
-
Photo Album
Slideshow: Do-It-Yourself Quantum Eraser
-
Sidebar
Web-Only Supplement: More on This Experiment
Notoriously, the theory of quantum mechanics reveals a fundamental weirdness in the way the world works. Commonsense notions at the very heart of our everyday perceptions of reality turn out to be violated: contradictory alternatives can coexist, such as an object following two different paths at the same time; objects do not simultaneously have precise positions and velocities; and the properties of objects and events we observe can be subject to an ineradicable randomness that has nothing to do with the imperfection of our tools or our eyesight.
Gone is the reliable world in which atoms and other particles travel around like well-behaved billiard balls on the green baize of reality. Instead they behave (sometimes) like waves, becoming dispersed over a region and capable of crisscrossing to form interference patterns.
This article was originally published with the title A Do-It-Yourself Quantum Eraser.
Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.



See what we're tweeting about






8 Comments
Add CommentBecause light has properties of both mass and wave function, then should light below the event horizon of a black hole go faster than C. If not then does light as we know it exist below the event horizon of a BH?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this...in video: http://grupocaos2007.brinkster.net/0lomas/lomas1.htm
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisStm. CristiᮠAntiba
So it is not really an eraser experiment at all, since it just filters in an interference pattern that was present all along, but hidden by being mixed in with an anti-interference pattern.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe "punchline" is invalid because light of different polarization doesn't interfere even in classical E&M.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe implied time paradox is an invalid one, as, under special relativity, all events occuring to a photon are simultaneous within its frame of reference. Since the two photons are traveling in the same reference frame, all of their events share simultaneity.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisvery good explanation
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNote that this experiment actually does not require a quantum explanation. Classical electromagnetic theory can explain the result by reminding us that there is a real interaction of the fields with electrons in the polarizing filter . See e.g. the reference below:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://van.physics.illinois.edu/qa/listing.php?id=16544
Moreover, the 3-polarizers effect can be reproduced with microwaves (i.e. 'light' of long wavelength) using the appropriate experimental set-up. Once more, no quantum explanation is really necessary for this experiment...
Tom Adams MD:
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI wonder if there are other feasibilities regarding the apparent behavior of light and black holes. Light can be potentially transformed into other non-observable artifacts "like" Bremsstrahlung. Bremsstrahlung is where a photon passes near an electron shell and evolves the electron shell into a higher energy state and the photon is absorbed.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bremsstrahlung
Does high density gravity fields make matter absorb photons? Perhaps what we are looking at is simply the mass where low temperature absorption is taking place.
I've wondered why x-rays are allowed to escape from black holes. Bremsstrahlung is frequency sensitive.
To test this theory, I'm wondering if there is another feature in the Universe that has different gradients of high gravity fields and photons escape at different frequencies other than just x-rays?
Perhaps Bremsstrahlung has a gravity (space-time curvature) component not yet part of its equations.
===
This would seem to imply that a black hole may be near some extreme, absolute zero because if all light is absorbed and the mass structure is transformed to some extremely stable state. An absolute high temperature state where a stable system of energy transformations are bound and perpetual. Or, systems of interactive extremes that support the observed characteristics.
One feature I find particularly interesting is that when a black hole is observed, that it can be observed. The movements of the galaxies and the gravitational lensing near a black hole should completely obscure its presence at our distance, unless there is fundemental causality (relativity) that connects the observer to the sources of the photons beyond the black hole.