A New Concept for a Constantly Adaptable Prosthetic Limb

Most amputees go through a lot of prosthetics in a lifetime. This can be expensive, especially in the developing world


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

A New Concept for a Constantly Adaptable Prosthetic Limb

A New Concept for a Constantly Adaptable Prosthetic Limb Image:

By Ben Schiller

Most amputees go through a lot of prosthetics in a lifetime. This can be expensive, especially in the developing world. The Beth Project aims to change that by making a prosthetic that can change along with the human body.

Van Phillips, who designed the Flex-Foot Cheetah blades that carried Oscar Pistorius to the Olympics, describes a bad prosthetic limb socket like a stone in your shoe: a nagging discomfort you have to live with until you get the thing adjusted, or replaced.

Many prosthetics wearers live with pain and soreness, either because the socket is badly fitted, or their residual limb changes volume and shape, pushing the socket out of place. According to Jason Hill, co-designer of a new type of prosthetic system, some amputees go through 20 sockets in a lifetime, because the old one no longer fits properly.

The aim of the new concept, called the Beth Project, is to give amputees something more customizable and adjustable. Instead of fabricating the socket in a specialist's workshop, the socket is shaped with a vacuum pump. The wearer places a silicon bladder over their limb, and then sucks the air out, making it hard like a vacuum-packed bag of coffee.

"We imagine that if their volume has changed over three months, and they are starting to get a sore, they would be able to reshape the surface," Hill says.

The product is aimed particularly at the developing world, where up to 30 million people require prosthetics, according to the World Health Organization. The issue is not so much about cost--cheap prosthetics exist, and many used ones are donated--but the need for specialists to adjust or replace the sockets. WHO says 180,000 trained staff are needed, and that there's a current shortage of about 40,000. Outfitting an average prosthetist's clinic, complete with grinders and vacuum formers, costs $70,000, according to Hill, and that's before you hire personnel to run it.

"Initially, we were thinking about making a cheaper socket, maybe using 3-D printing, or some other advanced manufacturing technique," Hill says. "But then we found out the real problem was the shortage of trained care. The 40,000 figure really jumped out at us."

BETH, or Benevolent Technologies For Health, grew out of a Hacking Medicine event at MIT, where it won a prize. The project was also picked as a runner-up prize in this year's Dyson Awards. Hill, and partner Elizabeth Tsai, are now looking for investors, and running through new prototypes.

Aside from the technology, one of the main challenges may be to persuade specialists who understandably take pride in their ability to shape sockets for their patients. "It's quite disruptive," Hill says. "So far, of the prosthetists we've talked to, the ones at the VA have been more supportive. They really look at it as in 'what is the best way we can provide affordable care?' Some of the private prosthetists don't want to relinquish what they do."


Fast Company Copyright 2012 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

A New Concept for a Constantly Adaptable Prosthetic Limb

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X