Cover Image: April 2001 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Aborted Thinking [Preview]

Reenacting the global gag rule threatens public health















Share on Tumblr

Hurt most

Hurt most by withdrawn U.S. funds could be Russia's abortion-providing centers. Image: SOVFOTO/EASTFOTO

With the very first act of his presidency, George W. Bush managed in one fell swoop to alienate myriad family-planning groups, women's health organizations, physicians and European allies. A memo to the U.S. Agency for International Development revived what is officially known as the Mexico City Policy--or, less formally, the Global Gag Rule. The order states that U.S. AID cannot dispense family-planning money to an organization unless it agrees to neither perform nor promote abortion. Rather than barring funds for abortion itself--the 1973 Helms Amendment already does that--the policy instead curbs health care providers' ability to talk about medical options at organizations that continue to accept aid. For those that do not comply, the policy means a loss of funds for counseling and contraception.

Many public health experts say the effects of this order today may be more devastating than they were in 1984, when the policy was first introduced. The world is a different place with regard to the AIDS epidemic, the desire for contraception and family-planning services, women's rights and attitudes toward abortion. President Bush's initiative will cut money where it is most needed, says Anibal Fa¿ndes, an obstetrician in Brazil and a member of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics. "Consequently, he will certainly be responsible for increasing the number of abortions instead of reducing them."


This article was originally published with the title Aborted Thinking.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Aborted Thinking: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X