Air Pollution Triggers Heart Risk for Cyclists

In big cities, cyclists breathe an array of pollutants from exhaust-spewing cars and trucks















Share on Tumblr



Image: Seth W./Flickr

NEW YORK – Even by this city's standards, the Garment District is an imposing place to ride a bike.

A never-ending parade of delivery trucks rumbles along 8th Avenue between 34th and 42nd streets, leaving a wake of gritty exhaust for cyclists to feel, smell and breathe.

After riding in the Garment District, Robert "Rocket" Ruiz, a 13-year veteran of the bike messenger business, would often look into the bathroom mirror and see his face covered in grime.

"I remember having to wash my face three or four times a day," said Ruiz, now the head dispatcher for Quik Trak Messenger Service. "There's nothing but tar and smoke on your face." Ruiz, a star on the Travel Channel's bike messenger show "Triple Rush," said he once had to miss a day of work to see a doctor because of exhaust burning his eyes.

Pedaling behind pollutant-spewing cars and trucks may not seem as scary as being hit by one, but scientists say it can pose invisible dangers.

Now, for the first time, cycling in heavy traffic has been linked to a heart health risk, Canadian researchers reported last month. A new study found cyclists in Ottawa, Ontario, had heart irregularities in the hours after their exposure to a variety of air pollutants on busy roads.

"Our findings suggest that short-term exposure to traffic may have a significant impact on cardiac autonomic function in healthy adults," the scientists from Health Canada, Environment Canada and the University of Ottawa wrote in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

The study does not suggest that bikers would be better off driving, experts say. Rather, the findings intensify the scrutiny on cyclists' pollution exposure, and point to simple solutions for a cleaner ride, such as avoiding busy roads like 8th Avenue whenever possible.

"It's something that actually concerns a lot of people that do cycle," said Michael Brauer, a cyclist and atmospheric scientist at the University of British Columbia who was not involved in the new study. "People want to understand their risk. They're just thinking all the time, 'Is this good for me? Is this bad for me? I'm doing my part, but there's this car that's throwing this exhaust in my face.' "

For the study, 42 healthy, non-smoking cyclists wore heart monitors before, during and after cycling for one hour on high- and low-traffic roads between May and September last year. Instruments on the bikes' panniers measured exposure to air pollution.

"Our findings suggest that short-term exposure to traffic may have a significant impact on cardiac autonomic function in healthy adults," the scientists from Health Canada, Environment Canada and the University of Ottawa wrote in the journal Environmental Health Perspectives.

The study does not suggest that bikers would be better off driving, experts say. Rather, the findings intensify the scrutiny on cyclists' pollution exposure, and point to simple solutions for a cleaner ride, such as avoiding busy roads like 8th Avenue whenever possible.

"It's something that actually concerns a lot of people that do cycle," said Michael Brauer, a cyclist and atmospheric scientist at the University of British Columbia who was not involved in the new study. "People want to understand their risk. They're just thinking all the time, 'Is this good for me? Is this bad for me? I'm doing my part, but there's this car that's throwing this exhaust in my face.' "

For the study, 42 healthy, non-smoking cyclists wore heart monitors before, during and after cycling for one hour on high- and low-traffic roads between May and September last year. Instruments on the bikes' panniers measured exposure to air pollution.

Researchers are not sure how air pollution alters heart rate variability. One idea is that particles in the lungs cause inflammation, which throws off the body's ability to carry out its automatic functions.For the Canadian cyclists, when their exposure to certain pollutants, including ultrafine particles, nitrogen dioxide or ozone, increased, their heart rate variability decreased, according to the study.



7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Trent1492 01:07 PM 7/7/11

    Two paragraphs of this text have been duplicated.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. sault 01:19 PM 7/7/11

    I bike to work about 99% of the time and I try to run errands on my bike as much as I can. It always irks me when someone passes me driving a diesel pickup or a huge SUV on a suburban road, spewing out much more pollution that they have to.

    I mean, I know that some people MIGHT need to tow something once a year or they have 5 kids or whatever, but when I see 1 person and zero cargo in a vehicle that looks like it has never been off road in its existence, I kind of wonder if that person even TRULY evaluated their REAL needs when buying that vehicle. Really, and this might sound smug, but why do I have to choke down all that extra pollution so THEY can have a false sense of security and an ego boost from their land yacht? What’s so hard about buying a sensible, fuel efficient passenger car for 99% of your driving and renting the pickup for the one or two times a year you actually use its capabilities?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. alan6302 11:36 PM 7/7/11

    The IC engine will soon be history. Never buy a new car.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. benbrilling in reply to Trent1492 02:45 AM 7/8/11

    You miscounted: 4 paragraphs (7, 8, 9, & 10) are duplicated (11, 12, 13, & 14).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. oldvic in reply to sault 02:58 AM 7/8/11

    "I mean, I know that some people MIGHT need to tow something once a year or they have 5 kids or whatever, but when I see 1 person and zero cargo in a vehicle that looks like it has never been off road in its existence, I kind of wonder if that person even TRULY evaluated their REAL needs when buying that vehicle. Really, and this might sound smug, but why do I have to choke down all that extra pollution so THEY can have a false sense of security and an ego boost from their land yacht? Whats so hard about buying a sensible, fuel efficient passenger car for 99% of your driving and renting the pickup for the one or two times a year you actually use its capabilities?"

    Ditto. It always amazes me, the level of irrationality associated with so much of our purchasing decisions, most of which seem aimed at social validation rather than at actual satisfaction of our needs. That's just putting too much power on other people's hands so that we can feel the approval of the herd.

    Returning to the article, as a bicycle commuter, I reduce the problem by choosing my hours carefully: the early bird avoids rush hour.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Squeedle in reply to oldvic 12:45 AM 7/16/11

    "the early bird avoids rush hour."

    The late bird does too.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. Rayman 03:55 AM 7/18/11

    Is it not true for anyone walking, or basically living, in our cities that pollution of all sorts will have an effect of their lungs? The concentration, due to high volumes of traffic, will be according to exposure. Any one working outside, from street vendors to police, etc. is exposed not just bicyclists. Improvements in car technologies is reducing pollution. But it is in our hands, or feet, how much we pollute. We all seem to be driving in a continuous high state of anxiety about "time" and seem to be speeding to all our destinations. It has been estimated that on average we all decrease efficiency, or miles per gallon, in the range of 30%. Speeding, idling, looking for that extra close parking slot, etc. basically throws about 1/3 of our gasoline purchase out the window! No wonder oil companies enjoy 8 to 10 billion in profits each quarter!! Yet,in view of these facts, we continue our wasteful driving habits much like addicts that continue behavior they know is bad for them. It has been said that you cannot manage what you do not measure. Have you measured your driving efficiency? Recent studies have confirmed that even with technology in the vehicle that can tell drivers how efficient, or not, they are driving, drivers will not change their habits. Average extra cost? About $400 each year. More for those who drive extra large vehicles.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Air Pollution Triggers Heart Risk for Cyclists

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X