From Nature magazine

A rare, hereditary form of autism has been found — and it may be treatable with protein supplements.

Genome sequencing of six children with autism has revealed mutations in a gene that stops several essential amino acids being depleted. Mice lacking this gene developed neurological problems related to autism that were reversed by dietary changes, a paper published today in Science shows¹.

“This might represent the first treatable form of autism,” says Joseph Gleeson, a child neurologist at the University of California, San Diego, who led the study. “That is both heartening to families with autism, and also I think revealing of the underlying mechanisms of autism.”

He emphasizes, however, that the mutations are likely to account for only a very small proportion of autism cases. “We don’t anticipate this is going to have implications for patients in general with autism,” says Gleeson. And there is as yet no proof that dietary supplements will help the six children, whose mutations the researchers identified by sequencing the exome — the part of the genome that codes for proteins.

In the family
The children came from three families with Middle Eastern ancestry; in each case the parents were first cousins. Studying such families makes the hunt for the rare recessive mutations underlying some forms of autism simpler than it would be among the general population, Gleeson says, because the odds are higher that children will be born with two copies of the recessive mutation.

In each family, Gleeson's team identified mutations that inactivate the enzyme BCKD-kinase, which normally prevents the body from breaking down branched-chain amino acids called leucine, isoleucine and valine after a meal. Humans cannot synthesize these amino acids and must obtain them from food.

“We predicted that patients would burn through these amino acids,” says Gleeson. The prediction was correct: after eating, the children had low blood levels of the branched-chain amino acids. Mice lacking the gene that codes for BCKD-kinase also had low levels of the amino acids in their blood and tissue.

Transport problems
How this deficiency causes autism is still a mystery. Branched-chain amino acids enter the brain through specialized transporters in the fortress of brain-protecting cells known as the blood–brain barrier. The transporter proteins also shuttle other large amino acids into the brain, and when levels of the branched-chain amino acids are low, more of these other large molecules get through. Gleeson’s team found high levels of these larger amino acids in the brains of mice lacking the BCKD-kinase gene.

Gleeson proposes that symptoms of autism are caused by low levels of branched-chain amino acids, high levels of these other amino acids or a combination of the two. The amino acids that were present at elevated levels in the brains of mutant mice provide the raw materials for two neurotransmitter chemicals, and the synapses where these chemicals are released are implicated in autism.

In mice, at least, the chemical imbalance can be treated. The mutant mice had neurological problems typical of mouse versions of autism, including tremors and epileptic seizures. But those symptoms disappeared in less than a week after the mice were put on diets enriched in branched-chain amino acids.

Gleeson’s team has tried supplementing the diets of the children with this form autism, using muscle-building supplements that contain branched-chain amino acids. The researchers found that the supplements restore the children's blood levels of amino acids to normal. As for their autism symptoms, Gleeson says, the “patients did not get any worse and their parents say they got better, but it’s anecdotal”.

1 Comments

1. 1. sunnystrobe 09:52 AM 9/14/12

   Nutritional'Amino Acid Deficiency' may indeed be found to underlie not only autism, but many if not most of our vexatious dis-orders and dis-eases, and Daniel Geschwind at U.C.L.A may prove to have been a true prophet here, pointing to 'a simple imbalance that one can correct with NUTRITION" ,and finding this 'exciting'.
   What I find strange though: WHY has NOBODY amongst Sci Am readers found this research report exciting yet ? There's NOT ONE comment! (in stark contrast to 70 plus YES or NO- commentaries whether or not to oust that strange bird prototype 'Archaeopterix' from textbooks, no doubt fuelled by Creationist vs.Evolutionistic fervour!)
   The NEW SCIENTIST, by the way, in its latest issue, has also an interesting article with a bold heading:
   Eat yourself into Dementia! Worth the read.
   Youthevity.com
   
   )
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this