Are Toxic Chemicals Responsible For High Obesity Rates In African-American Kids?

A new study has found a disproportionate amount of a chemical with links to obesity in the population of kids most likely to be overweight.


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

Are Toxic Chemicals Responsible For High Obesity Rates In African-American Kids?

Are Toxic Chemicals Responsible For High Obesity Rates In African-American Kids? Image:

By Ariel Schwartz

A new study has found a disproportionate amount of a chemical with links to obesity in the population of kids most likely to be overweight.

According to the CDC, African Americans have a 51% higher obesity rate and Hispanics have a 21% higher obesity rate than whites in the U.S. You might correctly presume that this has something to do with lifestyle differences--diet and physical activity, mostly. But there's another, less obvious factor in play: chemicals.

The scientific community has found increasing evidence that pthalates, a group of industrial chemicals found in everything from pharmaceuticals to personal care products, can increase obesity risk (much like the estrogen-mimicking compound BPA, which we've also discussed).

In a study published this week in Environmental Health Perspectives, researchers examined urinary pthalate concentrations and body mass of 2,884 ethnically diverse children between ages six and 19 that participated in a National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. They discovered that there is also a link between race and ethnicity, pthalates, and childhood obesity. Specifically, they found an association with the kind of pthalates (called low-molecular weight pthalates) commonly found in cosmetics, lotion, and creams with increased body mass among African American children--but not with Hispanics or whites. How can this be?

In the past, studies have shown that ethnic groups have varying urinary pthalate concentrations. "There exists the possibility of disproportionate consequences of that exposure," explains Dr. Leonardo Trasande, the lead author of the study and a pediatrician. That part is obvious enough. But the reasons behind why African Americans are more heavily exposed to pthalates aren't entirely clear.

One clue: a different study showed that an increased use of personal care products is associated with higher levels of those low-molecular weight pthalates (so maybe African Americans tend to use personal care products differently), but "there's only so far we can take this line of thinking," says Trasande. "We can't say for certain that an increase in exposure is linked to effect. There's also the possibility that predispositions can trigger effects."

Regardless of the reason, pthalate exposure is a real problem. Trasande and his colleagues write an increase in pthalate exposure could lead to a 1.7 pound increase in body weight, as well as increased chances of being both overweight and obese. It might not sound like much, but that's no trivial amount of weight. "Many risk factors for childhood obesity are in that range," says Trasande.

Since we don't know exactly African-Americans have higher levels of urinary pthalate concentrations, there isn't much we can do about--except to regulate pthalates for everyone. FDA, it's your move.




Fast Company Copyright 2013 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Are Toxic Chemicals Responsible For High Obesity Rates In African-American Kids?

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X