Launch Counter: U.S. Army Considers Quantum Cascade Lasers to Protect its Aircraft [Video]

The Pentagon will spend upward of $1.5 billion for smaller, lighter and more reliable infrared countermeasure systems to keep U.S. choppers from being taken down by small arms and shoulder-fired missiles














Share on Tumblr

laser,army,aircraft,war

CASCADE EFFECT: The most advanced Man-Portable Air-Defense Systems (MANPADS)--which include a launcher, battery and missile packed into a launch tube resting on the operator's shoulder--can hit an aircraft like a Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter (inset) at a range of up to eight kilometers. ITT and a number of other defense contractors are developing CIRCM systems such as the one pictured here to defend against this. Image: COURTESY OF SSGT SUZANNE M. JENKINS, USAF and ITT

A heat-seeking missile bearing down on an aircraft zeros in on the infrared signature of its exhaust. In the past the aircraft might deploy flares or, if the plane was large enough, it might use a rudimentary laser to disrupt the incoming missile's guidance system. Neither of these approaches has proved reliable enough for the U.S. military's liking, which is why the Army is considering new type of infrared countermeasure (IRCM) system that uses a smaller, more nimble solid-state laser designed to better protect helicopters and other low-flying aircraft from small arms and shoulder-fired missile attacks such as those that are so prevalent in Afghanistan and Iraq (pdf).

The Army's choice of updated IRCM systems is expected in a few months, which is why several defense contractors developing this technology are making a serious push for consideration at this week's annual Association of the United States Army meeting and expo in Washington, D.C.

Whereas the U.S. military, led by the Army, has for decades used IRCM technology weighing several dozens of kilograms to disrupt heat-seeking missile attacks, the Army is hoping a newer, lighter approach called Common Infrared Countermeasures (CIRCM) will more reliably protect a wider range of aircraft. To meet the Army's 38.6-kilogram CIRCM weight limit, some contractors are turning to solid-state quantum cascade lasers as a means of disrupting a missile's guidance system and throwing it off course.

Quantum cascade lasers, first developed at Bell Laboratories in 1994, are semiconductor lasers that emit in the mid- to far-infrared portion of the electromagnetic spectrum. Such lasers can be made smaller, lighter and more reliable than the optical parametric oscillator (OPO), the multiband laser OPO, and the fiber laser–pumped systems used in current IRCM systems. This is because a quantum cascade laser directly converts electrons entering the semiconductor to photons. (Multiple photons can even be generated by a single electron, improving the system's efficiency.) Other types of lasers require more complicated setups for generating the wavelengths needed to target missile-guidance systems. In addition, semiconductor lasers can be manufactured at about 4.5 millimeters in length in high volumes on wafers similar to the way transistors are produced. A conventional glass OPO laser could be up to half a meter long.

ITT Electronics Systems (see video below)—competing for the Army contract against BAE Systems, Northrop Grumman and Raytheon Co.—is proposing a CIRCM using a solid-state quantum cascade laser system developed by Daylight Solutions. The system, which Northrop Grumman is also using as part of its CIRCM bid, features a low-wattage semiconductor laser much like those found in DVD and CD players, although the CIRCM laser emits invisible wavelengths rather than optical red light, says Tim Day, president and CEO of Daylight Solutions.

ITT and Daylight have worked together in the past, with ITT integrating an earlier version of Daylight's fiber-coupled quantum cascade–based JammIR laser system into its IRCM technology. The companies claim to have conducted several successful flight tests  on board U.S. military Sikorsky UH-60 Black Hawk helicopters.

ITT has taken a modular approach to its CIRCM in an effort to make the system available to a wider range of aircraft. "We tried to make the system extremely flexible, having multiple boxes so we divide up the functionality, putting the lasers in one box, the pointer trackers in another and the power supply in still another box installed on the aircraft," says Bob Palazzo, ITT Electronic Systems' director of advanced programs. "We interconnect the boxes with a fiber-optic cable so they can be placed throughout the aircraft and provide a more balanced weight distribution."

Raytheon claims its CIRCM is seven kilograms less than the Army's requirement, light enough to be installed on unmanned aircraft systems drones—although this was not an Army requirement at this time.

The Army is looking to equip 1,076 aircraft with CIRCM systems initially at an estimated cost of $1 billion to $1.5 billion. If the CIRCM implementations are successful, the number of aircraft—primarily light- to medium-weight helicopters—outfitted with the technology is expected to grow to as many as 4,000. The Army is expected to choose two of the four competing companies within the next three months to move on to the technology development phase of the program.

Video courtesy of ITT


6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. pcollins 09:51 AM 10/13/11

    This may work for infra-red guided missiles fired at aircraft flying at mid- altitudes, but a low flying helicopter can easily be downed by a simple RPG. There is no defense against this very low-tech weapon, nor is there any defense against heavy caliber (12.7 mm and above) machine guns. I believe we rely too much on our advanced and expensive technology. Then there's the whole issue of fighting wars at all.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ronburley in reply to pcollins 12:58 PM 10/13/11

    You're assuming that this proposal actually has anything to do with the viability or necessity of the weapons. Read more closely and you'll see the true objective of the program... a $1 billion to $1.5 billion taxpayer-funded payout to the defense industry.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. eco-steve 06:04 PM 10/15/11

    If US choppers stayed in the USA, they would not need to spend billions on protecting them. Would it be unfair to suggest that that the choppers are only overseas to grab other peoples ressources? Would it not be better for the US to invest the money on solar panes?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. BrainWorld in reply to ronburley 01:39 AM 10/16/11

    This is just one drop in a bucket of money that goes to war profiteers, THIS is where we need to cut spending ARE YOU LISTENING, SUPERCOMMITTEE?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. mbleader 03:01 AM 10/16/11

    We know that the Libyan revolution has released hundreds if not thousands of MANPADS into the lethal mix of terrorist weapons. These are now available to anyone with the $$ and opportunities to attack civilian aircraft just about anywhere in the world. It only takes ONE or TWO successful hits to freeze international air traffic. Do you think Russia and China aren't just as worried as the USA about this problem?
    The immediate big future for this development is in the civilian market. Israel has already taken similar steps several years ago but will, or already has, upgraded to this system. Hurry.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. electric38 02:28 AM 10/19/11

    Today it's the latest/newest invention for our helicopters, tomorrow we sell the "gimmick" to the highest bidder on the open terrorist market. Then it gets taken to China where it gets dismantled and duplicated for 1/50th of our cost. Meanwhile, back at home more children fall below the poverty line and cannot afford health care.
    Go weapons manufacturers and your paid political machine!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Launch Counter: U.S. Army Considers Quantum Cascade Lasers to Protect its Aircraft [Video]

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X