They also hope to reverse-engineer other marine life forms, says Parker. “We’ve got a whole tank of stuff in there, and an octopus on order.”
This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on July 22, 2012.



See what we're tweeting about






12 Comments
Add CommentThank you so much for the Rat Jellyfish... this is more terrifying than fiction. Well justified if we can cheat the reaper? You think?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI think it's a wonderful work of scientific art! It does not need any kind of medical "utility" for its justification. Creativity is the only way to "cheat the reaper": whether by writing a poem, painting a picture or creating such a marvel of genetic engineering. "Unnatural" is not a dirty word: civilization is unnatural by definition.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is really cool, but... did they really just patent a jellyfish? I can see that sort of thing getting out of hand eventually.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI think I would be more enthusiastic if animal tissues were not used. It is cool that tissues can be crafted onto synthetic material (lots of medical uses) but something about this just bug me and I can't put my finger on it. Oh well, I will know what that is when I am officially 'old'.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAnd now you can grow a pet like plant that moves and closes its leaves when you Tickle It!.. Google pet TickleMe Plant. No joke ...this is real and actually was easy to grow from seeds,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhat is with these esoteric and useless studies? How much money and time was pi**ed away on this project?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisVyvyan, aside from the stupid cutsey spelling of your name, that statement of yours is inane.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisMust agree with Joseph Moore
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisScience today acts like a baboon with a paint brush the and its called art
What an utter waste of time and money
Mimosa, we have several plants in South Africa that does that naturally, its called "Kruidtjie--roer--my--niet" freely translated "do not touch me" Mellianthus specie
Joseph, try reading the whole article. The last paragraph on page one describes a reason why this experiment could result in something quite useful in medical research.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisScientific American, Nature Magazine, Harvard and Dr. Kit - this article is an embarassment. This cell structure growth project did not "build a Jellyfish." A Jellyfish is a complex living organism with an eye and brain. Scientists must be very careful what information they deliver to the media and to the public. Next time kindly get some help.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thiswij noemen het "kruidje roer me niet".
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy is this more exciting that Volta's original 19th Century discovery that frog muscles contract when connected to an electric current? After 200 years, and the invention of silicone rubber, it is nice to see that an elastic sheet can be made to simulate the action of an opposing muscle. Attaching living cells to an artificial substrate and making them imitate the action of a jelly fish is just tinkering. The cells will not reproduce, and their contraction depends on the application of an external electric field. Also, they will die if nutrients are not added to the water, and metabolic products removed. So, in essence, this does nothing but imitate the MOVEMENT of a jellyfish. It was no less an authority than Svengali who gave up disgust (in the silent movie) when he realized that what he was doing was nothing more than "Svengali making love to himself."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this