Cover Image: May 2001 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Assessment Results: Abstract [Preview]















Share on Tumblr

This report summarizes the economic analysis of the U. S. Geological Survey¿s 1998 petroleum assessment of the 1002 area of the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Volumes of technically recoverable oil and gas were assessed by geologists. Estimates of technically recoverable oil in undiscovered accumulations in the 1002 area range from 4.25 billions of barrels of oil (BBO) to 11.80 BBO with a mean of 7.69 BBO. The ranges in estimated volumes correspond to the 95 percent probability (that is, a 19 in 20 chance of occurrence) and the 5 percent probability level (1 in 20 chance), respectively. Estimates of technically recoverable non-associated gas in undiscovered gas fields range from 0 to 10.02 trillions of cubic feet of gas (TCFG) with a mean value of 3.48 TCFG. Non-associated gas resources were not examined in the economic analysis because they are not expected to be a target of explorationists for at least two decades.

Characteristics of the assessment important for the economic analysis included the field size distribution, location, and depth. At the mean estimate, 3.26 BBO is in fields of at least 500 million barrels. Accumulation size-frequency distributions associated with the 95th and 5th fractiles indicate 1.12 BBO and 6.43 BBO were assessed in fields of at least 500 million barrels, respectively. Plays of the undeformed area, the western part of the 1002 area, were assessed to contain more than 80 percent of the oil. Just over three-fourths of the assessed oil was assigned to depths of 10,000 feet or less. The economic analysis used the accumulation size-frequency distributions associated with the mean, 95th, and 5th fractile estimates of undiscovered technically recoverable oil. An after-tax 12 percent rate of return or hurdle rate was assumed. All calculations are in constant 1996 dollars.


Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Assessment Results: Abstract: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X