Astronomers Model the Collision That Spawned the Moon















Share on Tumblr

Astronomers have long agreed that debris from an object impacting Earth formed the moon. But exactly what hit Earth and when is still up for debate. To accommodate the size and angular momentum of the Earth-Moon system, various models have been suggested. One holds that the impact occurred early in Earth's history; another posits that two later collisions in sequence were responsible'or else a planetary body much larger than Mars must have been involved. Now new research suggests that a single collision with a Mars-size object near the end of Earth's formation gave rise to our satellite. The findings appear today in the journal Nature.

Robin Canup of the Southwest Research Institute and Erik Asphaug of the University of California at Santa Cruz used a highly detailed computer modeling system—one that divided Earth and its impactor into more than 20,000 tiny particles whose interactions under stress both with each other and with gravity were simulated—to investigate their scenario. "The model we propose is the least restrictive impact scenario," Canup says, "since it involves only a single impact and requires little or no modification of the Earth-Moon system after the Moon-forming event." It is also strikingly similar to the first proposed impact theory 25 years ago, before computer simulations were available.

The new model does not close the moon formation debate, however. As Jay Melosh of the University of Arizona points out in commentary accompanying the report, computer limitations required Canup and Asphaug to use a primitive version of the equation of state in their calculations. That equation does not distinguish between solid, melt and vapor phases of material—a limitation, Melosh asserts, because "vapor pressure seems to have been involved in a collision that spewed vaporized Earth material into orbit."



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jonwpowers 08:26 PM 8/19/11

    I don't know if any scientific thinking is along these lines, but I'll throw this in the melting pot.

    I think it very possible that it WAS Mars that CLIPPED the Earth to create our moon, leaving a thin crust in our Pacific Basin and a similar thin crust covering 42% of Mars. A glancing blow a little off equatorial would leave them both spinning in the same direction with similar spin rates,faster for the smaller body. These spins would slow in 4 billion years, the smaller body slowing more. Mars Now spins slightly slower than Earth. Axial tilts of Earth and Mars is similar too, which could be caused by the angle of collision.

    This could also have left enough debris behind to make the Asteroid belt, or much of it. Lunar mass is about 1% of Earths mass and the total mass of all asteroids is only about 4% of Lunar mass. There was much more astroidal mass before the late heavy bombardment and this is not to say ALL astroids came about from this collision. Most of these astroids having tiny masses compared to planets would have migrated further out over time, from Jupiters gravitational effects, Solar wind and Solar radiation pressure.

    Jon

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Astronomers Model the Collision That Spawned the Moon

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X