Baboons Recognize Complex Relationships















Share on Tumblr

baboons

Image: COURTESY OF DOROTHY CHENEY

We humans have an innate tendency to classify others into social groups based on a variety of criteria. But researchers have been unclear as to whether we are unique in that regard. Findings published today in the journal Science suggest that baboons are skilled at keeping track of complex rules governing relationships, too.

Thore J. Bergman and colleagues at the University of Pennsylvania studied a group of more than 80 baboons in the Okavango Delta in Botswana over a period of 12 years. During this time, the researchers were able to recognize a hierarchical structure amongst the families that persisted. It was unclear, however, whether the animals had a similar interpretation of their society. To test this hypothesis, the team made recordings of a variety of sounds from known female baboons and edited them together to make it seem as though the creatures were fighting with each other. These manufactured altercations--for example, playing a threat vocalization by a high-ranking female followed by the submission squeal of a lower-ranking animal--were then played through hidden speakers while the scientists recorded the reactions of listening baboons. "Rank-reversals [in which a higher-ranking animal seemed to be submitting to a lower-ranking one] run counter to their expectations, and a baboon will momentarily pause and give a look, just as you might if you didn¿t quite believe what you had just heard," Bergman says. "Our results demonstrated that these relationships were real and relevant to these baboons." In particular, interfamilial fracases got more attention than did arguments between members of the same family.

"Humans organize their knowledge of social relationships into a hierarchical structure, and they also make use of hierarchical structures when deducing relationships between words in language," notes study co-author Robert Seyfarth. "The existence of such complex social classifications in baboons, a species without language, suggests that the social pressures imposed by life in complex groups may have been one factor leading to the evolution of sophisticated cognition and language in our pre-human ancestors."

The results of a second study published in the same issue reveal another benefit to baboon socializing: more successful mothering. Joan B. Silk of the University of California at Los Angeles and her colleagues analyzed 16 years of behavioral data from a population of baboons in Kenya. They found that baboon moms that were more social--quantified by the amount of time they spent being groomed by other adult females--had more than the average number of offspring survive to 12 months of age. (If a baboon makes it to its first birthday, the equivalent of a human child turning five, it has a good chance of surviving to adulthood and breeding, the scientists note.) Robin Dunbar of the University of Liverpool writes in an accompanying commentary that "in evolutionary terms, sociality is good for you." Something to keep in mind as the holiday party season approaches.



Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Baboons Recognize Complex Relationships

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X