Although surprising, water on Vesta is not as much a revelation as it would have been a decade ago. In the interim researchers have found evidence for water ice on the moon and Mars. High-resolution observations of other small bodies such as Eros and Ida could reveal an even moister solar system, says Andy Rivkin, a planetary scientist at APL who was not involved in either paper. "If water was brought into Vesta via external impacts," he adds, "we would expect everything in the Asteroid Belt to have some water."
Richard Binzel, a professor of planetary science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, says the two findings are "the highlight of the Dawn mission" so far. He was not involved in the work for either paper but wrote a commentary accompanying them.
The Prettyman team's analysis of GRaND data delivered another key bit of knowledge about Vesta: The findings conclusively matched its composition to a class of meteorites on Earth called HED meteorites (composed of howardite, eucrite and diogenite). Researchers in the 1970s had matched the colors and reflective properties of Vesta's surface to the meteorites. Now, the Prettyman analysis of the asteroid's chemical composition confirms their source. "We are now fully confident that the [HED] meteorites are from Vesta," Binzel says.
As a result, researchers can prod, scrape and peer at the chemical and physical properties of the HED meteorites here on Earth and know they hold a record of the chemistry and history of Vesta. Because Vesta formed by the same process as Earth, called differentiation, Binzel says, the rocks are "almost a model of what the very early Earth would be like chemically."



See what we're tweeting about


1 Comments
Add CommentMarissa Fessenden you should be ashamed of yourself. The article you reference regarding early in the history asteroids and planets forming from molten material does NOT say that.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIt does NOT even infer that.
So why did you say it did?
Is it that you actually never read the article, or perhaps you have your own hypothesis about the subject and assumed from its title that it backed your own hunch?
Seriously in a nebula forming the solar system, the space between the objects is still vast and cold. If it were so hot that molten objects could stay molten as you describe, there would be no talk of an ice limit in the early solar system but a lava line.
And the article says perhaps 50% of the two objects it does talk about ever melted.
Really though you should read the article yourself to see how foolish you made yourself look.
I do realize that perhaps you are talking about the actual full piece in Nature, but if that is the case then the person who should be embarrassed is the one who wrote the article you referenced, because what it said does not reflect that possibility.