The Web Turns 20: Social Machines Redesign Democracy, Part 2 of 4

In this second article of a four-part series commemorating the World Wide Web's 20th birthday, Scientific American editor Mark Fischetti explains how online games and other Web-enabled social machines build machine intelligence--and help us, too















Share on Tumblr

berners-lee,web,gwap,social Foldit is an experimental GWAP (game with a purpose) about protein folding that was released in 2008 as a collaboration between the University of Washington's departments of Computer Science and Engineering and Biochemistry. As with many GWAPs, Foldit players actually help solve problems that computers cannot solve very well." data-pin-do="buttonBookmark">

FOLDIT: Foldit is an experimental GWAP (game with a purpose) about protein folding that was released in 2008 as a collaboration between the University of Washington's departments of Computer Science and Engineering and Biochemistry. As with many GWAPs, Foldit players actually help solve problems that computers cannot solve very well. Image: FOLDIT SCREEN CAPTURE COURTESY OF UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON'S DEPARTMENTS OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING AND BIOCHEMISTRY, VIA WIKIPEDIA

Editor's Note: The World Wide Web went live 20 years ago this month, on a single computer in Geneva, Switzerland. For the anniversary the Web's inventor, Tim Berners-Lee, has written an exclusive article for Scientific American. In it he confronts various threats that could ruin the Web, and explains why preserving the basic principles that have allowed the Web to flourish is essential to preventing its destruction.

While preparing the article, Berners-Lee also spoke to
Scientific American about emerging Web capabilities that could change how the online and physical worlds work. This four-part series covers some of the most intriguing, including the power of linked data, social machines, free bandwidth to the masses, and Web science.

Indeed, the Web is thriving—a recent cover story in
Wired magazine to the contrary notwithstanding. Scientific American editor Mark Fischetti tackles the differences between the two magazine's treatments in his blog, "The Web is (Not) Dead."


One of the Web's huge promises is that it will help people work together. Although the Web has made it easier for groups to share information and collaborate online, it could do much more. So-called social machines could allow large numbers of people to conduct better science, even to transform democracy.

You have probably already taken part in an embryonic social machine. For example, when you fill out an online form, you may be presented with a little box that has wavy-looking words in it, and you must type the words before you can proceed. This is a social machine known as captcha. By typing the words, you and other people who are seeing the same boxes are helping computers that are digitizing printed text to figure out words they cannot determine, for various technical or syntax reasons.

Luis von Ahn has pioneered these kinds of systems and taken them further. In one variation, you are shown an image and have to type a word to identify it, such as dog, house or asparagus. If a second person somewhere unknown to you types the same word, you each get a point. People play such games—games with a purpose (GWAP)—for hours, but the exercise is helping computers identify images that the machines could not recognize on their own, building up catalogs of machine intelligence.

Online review systems are simple social machines: Which restaurant should you go to? Which exercise bike should you buy? Check the reviews and ratings people have made. The ratings don't just help consumers, however; they can alter commerce. If Schwinn gets the best ratings it may sell more bikes, and vendors with poor ratings may go out of business. If most customers of the best-selling bikes comment on how much they like having a built-in heart-rate monitor, chances are that future bikes will have them.

Much larger opportunities exist, says Berners-Lee, the Web's inventor: "The question is can we design social machines to do better science, or to improve democracy? Sometimes we've been remarkably inept, as a community, at making decisions based on science, based on reason—the assessment of the facts. We need to be better at that."

In politics, he says, "we tend to view things in very simplistic terms: the Republican model, the Democrat model—which are not very well-defined models anyway. Can we organize people to be motivated to really look at the issues—the way they really look at images in those simple games?" For starters, he proposes, social machines could analyze a debate among candidates and produce a tree-like diagram showing each person's arguments and counterarguments, to reveal where the candidates really stand, regardless of their party affiliation.
 
To read about basic principles that Berners-Lee says are needed for the Web to flourish beyond its 20th anniversary this month, see "Long Live the Web."



1 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jtdwyer 02:24 PM 11/24/10

    Does Scientific American think that if they say that Tim Berners-Lee _invented_ what is now referred to in its entirety as the 'world wide web' often enough it will become true?

    As I recall, most of what is the WWW was invented and highly developed long before any invention by Tim Berners-Lee.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

The Web Turns 20: Social Machines Redesign Democracy, Part 2 of 4

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X