Cover Image: April 2006 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Beyond the Standard Model

Theoretical physicists are not yet at the end of their string















Share on Tumblr

UNWEAVING

UNWEAVING the debates about string theory. Image: DUSAN PETRICIC


Warped Passages: Unraveling The Mysteries of the Universe's Hidden Dimensions
by Lisa Randall
Ecco (HarperCollins), 2005

The Cosmic Landscape: String Theory and the Illusion of Intelligent Design
by Leonard Susskind
Little, Brown and Company, 2005

Hiding In the Mirror: The Mysterious Allure of Extra Dimensions, From Plato to String Theory and Beyond
by Lawrence M. Krauss
Viking, 2005
What are theoretical physicists up to these days? Judging from the titles of the popularizations they are turning out, one might be forgiven for thinking that they are eating psychedelic mushrooms or chewing on lotus leaves. Warped Passages, Hiding in the Mirror, The Cosmic Landscape--sounds like a trilogy by Carlos Castaneda.

Well, what should theoretical physicists be up to? It's been three decades since the so-called Standard Model was hammered out. Thanks to this remarkable achievement, the behavior of all known particles can be described with exquisite precision, right down to the 11th decimal place. The only force the Standard Model leaves out is gravity, and that is handled very nicely by Einstein's theory of general relativity. Considering that the Standard Model and general relativity together account for any conceivable observation we might make, further theorizing can, without prejudice, be dismissed as metaphysics--which, of course, literally means "after physics."

Needless to say, the authors of these books--accomplished theoretical physicists, all three--don't buy this characterization. Theory has a future, they think, and it will probably involve a fairly extravagant addition to what we think of as reality. Beyond that, however, they don't see eye to eye.

Lisa Randall of Harvard University takes a cautious "bottom-up" approach: she wants to keep her theorizing firmly rooted in the actual observation of elementary particles. And what worries her most is a rather specific flaw in the theoretical status quo: our inability to explain why gravity is so absurdly weak compared with the other forces of nature. To solve this "hierarchy problem," she and her collaborator, Raman Sundrum, have posited the existence of a hitherto unnoticed dimension of space--not a little curled-up dimension, like those of string theory, but a large, possibly infinite dimension. As she explains in Warped Passages, our 3-D world may inhabit this 4-D space the way a shower curtain inhabits a bathroom. The particles in our world are like the water droplets running over the surface of the shower curtain. Only gravitons can escape the curtain into the larger space, and such leakage may account for the observed weakness of gravity compared with the other forces.

Leonard Susskind of Stanford University is very much a "top-down" fellow. In fact, he is one of the creators of string theory. In the four decades of its existence, string theory has not generated any novel predictions that can be tested. Nor have the legions of physicists who pursue string theory been able to find a mathematically unique version of it. At present, there is an enormous "landscape" of theoretical possibilities, numbering something like 1 followed by 500 zeros. Each version corresponds to a different universe with what might be called its own local weather: vacuum energy, number of dimensions, elementary particle masses, coupling constants, and so on. In The Cosmic Landscape, Susskind tries to make a virtue of this seeming embarrassment. Invoking inflationary cosmology, he submits that each of these theoretical possibilities has actually bubbled into existence as a "pocket universe." Together all these pocket universes make up what he calls the "megaverse" (other physicists prefer "multiverse"). Among this enormous multiplicity of pocket universes, Susskind further contends, there is bound to be one with just the right vacuum energy to permit the emergence of intelligent beings. No wonder we observe ourselves to be living in such a miraculously fine-tuned universe, he concludes, unabashedly embracing the notorious anthropic principle.



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Douglas W Lipp 10:20 PM 5/15/09

    Try, " The Coney Island Green Theory" !!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. MiMi Deborah 02:05 AM 2/22/10

    The Standard Model is problematic. The hierarchy of dimensions as presented by a three + space/time prison begs explanation due to the absence of whole sricture(s) for missing force(s) as yet accounted for due to the complacency associated with the 'relgious fanacicism' that occurs among dogmatic advocates of the Standard Model.

    Upon reading of Dyson's lethargy in this article, I consider him and his like minded 'clergy' to be on par with other figures in history associated with shamelessly 'leading' their 'flock' by encouraging the/a 'form' of illiteracy.

    Deborah Wheeler Morales

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. debu 01:03 PM 7/7/10

    Dr.Durgadas Datta published ether=gravity=dark energy theory of gravitoethertons and balloon inside balloon theory of matter and antimatter on opposite entropy path in the year 2002 in ASTRONOMY.NET. To day all observations like DARK FLOW etc indicates that the theory is correct . Dr.Datta said that gravitoethertons produced by annihilation of matter and antimatter at the common spherical boundary is composed of five God particles as below. 1/graviton --for gravity. 2/ ston ston --for strong nuclear 3/ weakon --for weak nuclear .4/ magon--for electromagnetic and 5/ masson --for mass creation. We are waiting LHC experiment to confirm Dr. Dattas theory in next startup on 15TeV charge.--HOME RESEARCH..

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Beyond the Standard Model: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X