Since its discovery in the early 1990s, functional MRI has been the basis for more than 19,000 studies of the living, working brain. The technique allows scientists an unprecedented glimpse of the brain regions that are most active during particular tasks or states of mind, but it does not do so directly: the scans measure blood flow, which seems to increase around neurons that are firing. Neurons are not directly connected to blood vessels, however, so until now the mechanism underlying fMRI’s robust success has been a mystery.
Now a team from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology reveals that the support cells dubbed astrocytes (because of their star-shaped bodies) form the link between neurons and blood vessels, as reported in the July 7 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. The neuroscientists used a technique called two-photon microscopy, which harnesses light particles to image very small structures, to observe cells in ferrets’ brains. As the animals were shown different animated graphics, neurons responded within milliseconds, and astrocytes became active seconds later—matching the time delay that neuroimagers have long known accompanies blood flow to active brain regions. When the M.I.T. team blocked astrocyte function, the ferrets’ neurons fired as usual, but blood flow did not increase.
When researchers use fMRI, co-author Mriganka Sur explains, “we are really measuring astrocyte activation. Thus, anything that influences astrocytes is likely to influence fMRI.” This finding could add a layer of complexity to the interpretation of fMRI scans, because astrocytes may be subject to a different set of genetic and environmental influences than neurons are. But the more researchers understand about what is really happening when the brain “lights up” in an fMRI scan, the better they will be able to use the technology to learn about human cognition.
Note: This article was originally printed with the title, "Brain-Scan Mystery Solved".
See what we're tweeting about
1 Comments
Add Commentthe erosion of opposition to nuclear power is a mathematical certainty, similar to the erosion of natural petroleum supplies. political factions against using technology to solve problems encountered with human modernity are head in sand know nothing attempts to revert to the imaginary comfort of times long gone. safe low risk nuclear power is a sane and reasonable alternative to choking on fouled carbonized air.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this