Health Care in a Huff: Breath Tests for Diseases

Breathalyzers, long a tool in police officers' quivers, may be coming soon to a doctor's office near you















Share on Tumblr



BREATH TEST: A woman breathes into a collection tube for two minutes, providing a breath sample that could potentially be used to screen for a variety of diseases Image: COURTESY OF MENSSANA RESEARCH, INC.

Most of us associate Breathalyzers with drunk-driving arrests. But breath tests can reveal a lot more than how many alcoholic beverages a person chugged. They're also used to diagnose some medical conditions, including jaundice in babies, lactose intolerance and ulcers, as well as to monitor whether asthma drugs are effective. And researchers say breath analyzers may one day be used to quickly identify a slew of other disorders, including cancer, leading to early detection and treatment.

The way these tests work: Every time you take a breath, you inhale oxygen and exhale carbon dioxide (CO2), along with at least a thousand other chemicals that actually provide a so-called "breathprint," or unique breath profile of your health. The first person to recognize—or at least write about—this phenom was Hippocrates (460 B.C. to 377 B.C.), considered to be the father of medicine, who suggested that bad breath was a sign of disease. But it was not until late last century that scientists actually identified many of these chemicals.

In 1971, researchers led by Nobel Prize winning chemist Linus Pauling identified about 250 breath chemicals using gas–liquid partition chromatography (which  separates molecules based on their boiling points and polarity, or unequal electrical charges).

Thanks to improvements in laboratory techniques, scientists have since identified at least 1,000 different chemicals in human breath, a few of which have become the basis of medical tests. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved six medical breath tests, according to Terence Risby, a professor of environmental health science at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health in Baltimore.

The most common is one used to determine whether breathing tubes are correctly positioned in patients' lungs (occasionally doctors accidentally thread the tube through the esophagus and into the stomach), according to Raed Dweik, a pulmonologist and director of the Pulmonary Vascular Program at the Cleveland Clinic in Ohio. If the tube is properly placed, CO2 moves from the lungs and out through the tube; if not, carbon dioxide will not flow out. A golf ball-size CO2 detector changes color when it picks up the gas, signaling to doctors that the tube is positioned correctly. Another type of carbon dioxide detector known as a capnograph is routinely used in hospitals to continuously monitor the amount of CO2 exhaled by patients anesthetized for surgery or hooked up to ventilators to help them breath. Dweik says that doctors can determine if patients are getting enough oxygen by the amount of carbon dioxide leaving their bodies. 

Physicians now also use a breath test to determine whether asthma meds are working by measuring the amount of nitric oxide a patient with the respiratory illness exhales. According to Dweik, people with asthma, which is marked by chronic inflammation of the airways and difficulty breathing, exhale abnormally high levels of nitric oxide, a gas  that regulates blood flow but may damage cells and cause inflammation if overproduced in the airways: The nitric oxide content of an asthmatic's breath can be as high as 100 or 200 parts per billion or ppb (100 nitric oxide molecules in every billion exhaled molecules) compared with the 10 to 20 ppb in each breath of a nonasthmatic person.

If an asthma patient is not exhaling normal nitric oxide levels within days of beginning a treatment, it indicates the therapy is not effective and another one should be tried. "The whole test takes about five minutes," Dweik says, noting that a patient breathes into a tube attached to a breath analyzer, which produces an electronic readout of nitric oxide concentrations.

Physicians can diagnose lactose intolerance with a test that identifies abnormally high levels of hydrogen in the breath produced by gut bacteria that gobble lactose when the body fails to break down the milk sugar on its own. In addition, jaundice in babies can be confirmed with a test that scans the breath for high levels of carbon monoxide produced when the liver is not functioning properly, and there's a breath test that identifies the presence of the ulcer-promoting intestinal bacteria Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).
 



4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Anirudh Chaturvedi 12:55 PM 3/6/09

    This truly is breath taking technology
    Go MENSSANA !!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Aurametrix 11:05 AM 4/4/09

    Want to participate in breath-test research? Call Ashley, the study coordinator at (415) 342-0886 if you:
    � Have newly diagnosed or recurrent biopsy-confirmed ovarian cancer, fallopian tube cancer, or primary peritoneal cancer, and have not yet begun treatment, or
    � Have endometriosis, or
    � Have polycystic ovarian syndrome or
    � are a healthy woman

    http://home.comcast.net/~aurametrix/site/?/page/Studies/

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. kilingtonskier 04:09 PM 6/26/10

    Regarding breath testing for asthma response, if the medication is working, it will be noted by an improvement in exhaled flow rates resulting from decreased air trapped in the lungs, along with significant improvement in the patient's well being.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. breathalyzer 05:00 PM 7/20/10

    visit http://www.breathalyzeralcoholtester.com to purchase a breathalyzer

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Health Care in a Huff: Breath Tests for Diseases

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X