Pollock or Not? Can Fractals Spot a Fake Masterpiece?

Complex geometric patterns turn up in non-Pollock drip paintings















Share on Tumblr

Taylor argues that the researchers applied his fractal criteria incorrectly on Untitled and notes that their Wooden Horse analysis hinges on paint covering less than 5 percent of the canvas, which makes drawing conclusions tricky.

Moreover, he says, the group's conclusion turns on a misconception. "There's an image out there of fractal analysis where you send the image through a computer and if a red light comes on it means it isn't a Pollock and if a green light comes on it is. We have never supported or encouraged such a mindless view."

Even if the new results are correct, Farid says, fractal analysis can still serve as one piece of evidence in the broader puzzle of authentication, which also involves historical and aesthetic judgments. Earlier this year, for example, a Harvard team reported that two pigments found in the 32 alleged Pollocks were not used in paints before 1996 and 1971.

"None of these tools stands by itself," Farid says.

Owners of authentic Pollocks, however, do stand to make a lot of money. Last year, the Pollock painting No. 5, 1948, was reportedly sold to a Mexican financier for a record $140 million.



4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. brenda luckin 06:49 PM 12/20/07

    I am interested in the paint
    medium of works on paper
    around 1940's could it be an early acrylic based paint or
    one Pollack made himself.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. JohnHInes 12:03 AM 1/21/08

    Is it Pollack
    Or is it fake?
    Does it lack
    some data break?
    Did Pollack plot
    Some corner on style?
    That others cannot
    Share after a while?
    Is Pollack the only one
    To match the data plot
    Because of what he's done
    To make the style he's got?
    Or is a pattern a pattern
    And a data plot objective
    So others have their turn
    To be Pollack subjective?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. JohnHInes 12:07 AM 1/21/08

    Is Pollack the only one
    To match the data plot
    Just because of what he's done
    To make the style he's got?

    Or is a pattern a pattern
    That is a plot objective?
    So that others can learn
    To make Pollack subjective?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. gunondeer 05:28 AM 2/15/08

    Why does that painting look familiar,asked the space traveler of his companion. "Io don't know " was the reply.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

Tweets could not be retrieved at this time

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Pollock or Not? Can Fractals Spot a Fake Masterpiece?

X
Scientific American MIND iPad

Tap into your MIND

Get Both Print & Tablet Editions for one low price!

Subscribe Now >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X