CARBON NANOTUBE: Researchers studied multiwalled carbon nanotubes comprising anywhere from two to 50 cylinders concentrically stacked with a common long axis.
Image: Courtesy of the University of Edinburgh/MRC Center for Inflammation Research
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
Inhaling carbon nanotubes could be as harmful as breathing in asbestos, and its use should be regulated lest it lead to the same cancer and breathing problems that prompted a ban on the use of asbestos as insulation in buildings, according a new study posted online today by Nature Nanotechnology.
During the study, led by the Queen's Medical Research Institute at the University of Edinburgh/MRC Center for Inflammation Research (CIR) in Scotland, scientists observed that long, thin carbon nanotubes look and behave like asbestos fibers, which have been shown to cause mesothelioma , a deadly cancer of the membrane lining the body's internal organs (in particular the lungs) that can take 30 to 40 years to appear following exposure. Asbestos fibers are especially harmful, because they are small enough to penetrate deep into the lungs yet too long for the body's immune system to destroy.
The researchers reached their conclusions after they exposed lab mice to needle-thin nanotubes: The inside lining of the animals' body cavities became inflamed and formed lesions.
Carbon nanotubes are generally made from sheets of graphite no thicker than an atom—about a nanometer, or one billionth of a meter wide—and formed into cylinders, with the diameter varying from a few nanometers up to tens of nanometers. (They can be hundreds or even thousands of nanometers long.) There is a greater concern about "multiwalled" nanotubes consisting of several reinforced cylinders, because they are able to retain their pointy shapes better than thinner nanotubes.
Scientists have been noting the similarities between carbon nanotubes and asbestos for the past few years, says study co-author Andrew Maynard, chief science advisor for the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars's Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, based in Washington, D.C. Maynard, who has been researching and warning of the potential health and environmental risks of carbon nanotubes since 2003, says that there has been no coordinated effort to date to analyze the findings of carbon nanotube toxicity studies. He notes that technology companies have not found that the risks of using carbon nanotubes outweigh the benefits—they are excellent conductors of electricity.
Carbon nanotubes can also be used to reinforce polymers to create very strong plastics. University of Michigan at Ann Arbor researchers are scaling the strength of nanosheets and a nanoscale polymer resembling white glue. Visually, it looks like a brick wall, in which clay nanosheet "bricks" are held together by water-soluble polyvinyl alcohol "mortar". The result, according to the researchers, is a composite plastic that is light and transparent but as strong as steel.
IBM has identified carbon nanotubes as important for studying electrical and optical phenomena on the nanometer scale, and the company has high hopes for the technology. Carbon nanotubes show promise as building blocks for computer chips that are "smaller, faster and lower power" than those made of silicon, Phaedon Avouris, an IBM fellow and lead researcher on the company's carbon nanotube efforts, wrote in the March 2007 issue of Physics World. "One of the most exciting developments in carbon nanotube research is the recent discovery that nanotubes can emit light," he added. "That finding opens the door to circuits in which standard copper interconnects are replaced by optical waveguides made from nanotubes—allowing the possibility of fully integrated optoelectronic circuits."
Nanotubes are likewise being developed for use in new drugs, energy-efficient batteries, electronics and other products under the assumption that they are no more dangerous than graphite. But some scientists and environmentalists like Maynard caution that they harbor hidden dangers. Compounding this concern is the prediction that the market for carbon nanotubes will grow from $6 million in 2004 to more than $1 billion by 2014, according to studies by a number of firms, including the Freedonia Group. A 2006 report from Lux Research projected that nanoscale technologies will be used in $2.6 trillion worth of manufactured goods by the year 2014.
The Edinburgh CIR study, which will also appear in the June issue of Nature Nanotechnology, was very specific, looking only at nanotubes that emulated fiber behavior and their potential to cause a certain type of cancer; other types of nanotubes could affect the body differently—for better or worse, researchers say.
Maynard and his colleagues focused their attention specifically on the hypothesis that long, thin carbon nanotubes could have the same impact as similarly shaped asbestos fibers. "If you get these things into the lungs," he says, "they form scarlike tissue, and the body sees them like a scaffolding, building new cells over them and thickening the walls of the lungs."
The study is not intended to keep nanotechnology from developing further but rather to flag potential dangers of nanotubes in places at manufacturing and disposal sites, the researchers wrote in their paper.
"There is an immediate need to examine how carbon nanotubes are being used and see if there's any chance that [people] are being exposed to dangerous materials," Maynard says, adding that no one paid attention to the dangers of asbestos until it was too late for a lot of people.
See what we're tweeting about
12 Comments
Add CommentAn interesting article. The US government was aware of the potential dangers of asbestos as early as the 1920s, but no serious action was taken to reduce exposure to the stuff till lawsuits were brought against the manufacturers by shipyard workers during the 1970s. As a radiation worker, my own exposure was dramatically reduced because of the fear of lawsuits. Even today, we don't know with certainty the long term effects of cell phones, plastic bottles and the like. So it's good to see someone sounding the alarm for potential dangers like this before they cause grievous harm. Or perhaps the dangers mentioned here will motivate the companies to create a safer product.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe most interesting thing in this article is the fact, that nanotubes can emitt light. If they even use less energy than light bulbs, light bulbs might soon be relics of the past :) And if the nanotubes are magnetic socket could also be replaced by magnet that let the nanotubes hover in midair. Designers would love this.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAdditional to that optical data transfer in future computers would be awesome !
.
.
.
Sad thing nanotubes are so dangerous to health :(
The article doesn't say how the mice were exposed to the carbon nanotubes. I agree we should look into this more closely; however, that doesn't mean we should halt all study or use of nanotubes out of fear of the unknown. As a society, we either tend to ignore or overreact to environmental concerns.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thiswho is the Author
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisLarry Greenemeier
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis study was a waste of resources.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisNext time you run into some of them nasty carbon nanotubes, do like me an' Al: DON'T INHALE.
As we all know Nanotubes are very helpful to strengthen durability of products made from it so,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this1) Can we create such Nanotubes which wont harm human beings.If yes please start work on it i know it is not as easy as i simply comment but we need to for not us but for human being.
Chirag.
This is in line with our directed developments where our concept is to extract the debris at the source, when generated. Our patented process is now being used by one aerospace systems supplier. As more people become aware of the proper method to contain these materials perhaps some won't suffer the terrible death such as my neigbor several years ago. Thanks for confirming / alerting this issue.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs a 28 year old with stage 3 Meso, it's nice to hear that this issue is being raised.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI hope you are not that ignorant and you're just trolling.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs Hugh pointed out, the government knew of the dangers in the '20s and did nothing. Now they have been warned of the potential danger of nanotubes. What makes any anyone think something will be done until profit is affected!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRight on
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this