China Builds New Rockets for Space Station, Moon Missions

The country is pouring funds into new tech, with an eye on future lunar exploration


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr



China tests a new liquid oxygen and kerosene engine for its planned Long March-5 rocket. Image: China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation

China is making progress in creating a new line of launchers for advancing its space station plans, as well as bolstering its capability to land robots — and possibly humans — on the moon.

Earlier this year, the China Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation announced it had successfully conducted a 200-second test firing with the Long March 5 rocket's 120-ton-thrust liquid oxygen (LOX) and kerosene engine. The engine is far more powerful than the 75-ton-thrust engines of the rockets used to launch China's piloted Shenzhou spacecraft.

The China Manned Space Engineering (CMSE) Office has noted that the high-performance engine is the first kind of high-pressure staged combustion cycle engine for which China has proprietary intellectual property rights. It is non-toxic, pollution-free and highly reliable, the CMSE stated, adding that the engine makes China the second country in the world, after Russia, to grasp the core technologies for a LOX/kerosene high-pressure staged combustion cycle rocket engine.

CMSE officials say the Long March 5 should make its maiden voyage in 2014. Ahead of that, several limit-determining tests will be conducted to ensure the engine's stability and reliability. [Gallery: The World's Tallest Rockets]

To support launches of the Long March 5 and other next-generation boosters — a Long March 6 and Long March 7 are also under development — China is also building a spaceport, complete with a theme park, in Hainan, an island province off the south coast.

Hard at work

According to Liang Xiaohong, deputy head of the China Academy of Launch Vehicle Technology, production of the 197-foot-long (60 meters) rocket’s key components will be completed within this year.

Liang told China's state-run Xinhua news agency that the Long March 5 will more than triple Chinese rockets’ carrying capacity by lofting a maximum of 25 tons to low Earth-orbit and 14 tons to geosynchronous orbit.

The successful test of the first stage of the Long March 5 earlier this year was highlighted by Gregory Kulacki, senior analyst and China project manager in the global security program of the Union of Concerned Scientists based in Cambridge, Mass.

"The date most often associated with the Long March 5 is 2014, when the new launch facility in Hainan should be completed," Kulacki said.

He added that the increased lift is critical to China’s plans to build a space station by 2020, and to the third phase of the nation's Chang’e lunar program, which aims to return lunar rock samples — collected by a robotic rover — back to China for analysis.

Three-stage plan

"Although the Long March-5 has had some technical difficulties and is behind schedule, the successful testing of the LOX engines last July makes the 2014 target date for beginning its operational use feasible," said Joan Johnson-Freese, a national security affairs professor at the U.S. Naval War College in Newport,R.I.

Johnson-Freese told SPACE.com that the Long March 5 is necessary to launch China’s space station into orbit — the culmination of its three-stage plan for human spaceflight.

China launched its robotic Tiangong 1 space laboratory in September 2011. In June of this year, a crew of three aboard the Shenzhou 9 craft docked to the lab, staying onboard for several days before returning to Earth. On the drawing boards, according to Chinese space officials, is a large space station to be in Earth orbit in the 2020 time frame. [Photos: China's First Manned Space Docking]

"While current capacity was sufficient to place the Tiangong space module into orbit, a larger space station is beyond China’s current capacity," Johnson-Freese said. "Contrary to often popular belief that a manned lunar landing is already approved and under development in China, a space station has always been the goal of their 30-year plan for human spaceflight approved in 1992, as Project 921."

Crews to the moon

Charles Vick, senior technical analyst for GlobalSecurity.org in Alexandria, Va., said that China’s buildup of a new family of boosters "implies a capability that the U.S. may find difficult on the world stage of geopolitical influence to contend with, much less compete."

Vick said that the Long March 5 offers China the capability to carry out crewed lunar circumnavigation and lunar orbit flights.

"The absence of evidence on these human lunar exploration goals does not mean something is not happening," Vick said. "It can be quite to the contrary and more often than not it should be a red flag warning that something is indeed going on that will eventually manifest itself."

China’s parallel development of new launch vehicles, its piloted Shenzhou spacecraft program and spacewalking and docking activities support the nation's space station and moon plans, Vick said. “That cannot be ignored."

Efficiencies in production

Dean Cheng, a China space expert and research fellow at The Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center in Washington, D.C., told SPACE.com that the Long March 5 is presumably tied into the larger Chinese lunar effort, especially the current robotic phase of lunar exploration.

"It’s interesting to note, however, that the latest space white paper from China, released on December 31, 2011, indicates an official study effort is now underway for manned lunar exploration," Cheng said.

The actual white paper language states: "China will conduct studies on the preliminary plan for a human lunar landing."

The Long March 5 seems to be part of a larger family of vehicles, Cheng said, "reflecting a fairly effective effort at amortizing the costs of developing new technologies by applying them across a family of launch vehicles. This will likely generate efficiencies in production. We have probably not seen the last of China as a competitor for providing commercial space launch."

Classic clash

In Cheng’s view, the Chinese are pursuing space launchwith state-owned enterprises as the preferred solution path.

"In the United States, we’re going to rely more on SpaceX, a private company, in the hopes/expectation that they will be able to fulfill launch commitments and even deliver people, while making a profit, and hopefully innovating," Cheng said. "A classic clash between two fundamentally different approaches.".

Cheng said that the concentration of major facilities on Hainan island, including the new launch site, "is probably a factor in growing Chinese assertiveness over territorial claims to the entire South China Sea."

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Percival 02:33 PM 10/26/12

    So, China is the new America. What does that make America, the new Britain?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. stefanharjes 02:54 PM 10/26/12

    This sounds just boring. America did shoot people up to the moon, they collected rocks and brought them back.

    What we need now is some robot, which once you shoot it to the moon/asteroid, will build a station using material present on that body. Then you can shoot up people, to enjoy the view...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. M Tucker 03:33 PM 10/26/12

    "China is making progress in creating a new line of launchers for advancing its space station plans, as well as bolstering its capability to land robots — and possibly humans — on the moon."

    Possibly landing humans on the moon…they have a way to go before they are even close. I do wish them well though. The US gave up on human exploration of other planets a long time ago but NASA has not completely given up on a plan to send humans to Mars. The US is still actively pursuing robotic space exploration and China will not even be at that level for a while. But if NASA is going to keep up with robotic exploration they must overcome conservative opposition in congress. Conservatives what to privatize everything. So we have no successor program for the Space Shuttle. Would the Hubble Space Telescope have been possible without the Shuttle? Given the corrections that had to me made to have it work at all? We sure would not have the International Space Station without the Shuttle.

    Yep, all we have in the US is SpaceX and they can’t even get a man to the ISS yet. The only American representative to comment on China’s space program was Dean Cheng who is the China space expert at The Heritage Foundation’s Asian Studies Center in Washington, D.C. A conservative organization with strong anti-government, pro-private industry ideologies. I hope SpaceX succeeds because that is all we got.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. sethdiyal 03:58 PM 10/26/12

    The Space X plans include these large boosters in future with the new Merlin 2 engine at a far cheaper cost than the money now being wasted on the new SLS system with a delivery date ahead of the Chinese project.

    Space X's better idea is the reuseable rocket reducing costs to where BigLow stations and orbital assembly of nuke powered space tugs, asteroid, Mars and moon exploration and industrial missions become possible.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Mendrys in reply to Forsythkid 06:00 PM 10/26/12

    Perhaps we are "fading" or maybe it is more accurately stated that others are catching up. In any case they are attempting to match a feat from nearly a half century ago.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. blueyedlion 01:16 AM 10/30/12

    It would seem America's starting to be left behind as China pushes forward with a mature and yet humble attitude to the power struggle

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. greenhome123 06:41 PM 10/30/12

    I'm glad to see that China looking to send humans and robots to the moon, but disappointed that the USA is no longer doing so. I believe the US should spend less money on defense and more money on space exploration and manned missions to the moon and Mars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. jerryd 03:08 PM 11/1/12


    This will do them a lot of good when China crumbles from within from corruption, aging population and way too many males, etc. I doubt they well be much of anything but internal fighting within 10 yrs.

    Sadly their goal like this is something a small company in the US is farther ahead of them after only starting less than 10 yrs ago, SpaceX. We did it 40 yrs ago also says a lot about the Chinese.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. PatrickR 04:37 PM 11/1/12

    Some people here seem to have forgotten we have a Mars mission in progress.
    I can't imagine what the moon's going to look like once the Chinese get there and add more space junk to an environment already littered with debris from previous missions.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

China Builds New Rockets for Space Station, Moon Missions

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X