China's Energy Dragon Looks Tamer to One Forecaster

A revised forecast has China's energy growth tapering off decades earlier than previously thought, with implications for climate and diplomacy.















Share on Tumblr

China, development, construction

Image: Daniel Christensen via Wikimedia Commons

Chinese skylines are defined by construction cranes and the din of jackhammers. China produces 50 percent of the world's cement [pdf]—the next largest producer, India is responsible for just 6 percent—to build seemingly endless tracts of high rises, railroads, parking lots, highways, airports and shopping malls. But all booms end—and China's may end sooner than most people think.

A study released on April 27 by Lawrence Berkeley National Lab's (LBNL) China Energy Group says that this high-growth phase of China's development could wind down in less than two decades. China's energy use will cease to be a great unknown, threatening and shape-shifting as a dragon, and become something that is, if not tame, at least simpler to predict.

The LBNL forecast is the first such survey that attempts to come to grips not only with China's energy and resource needs during the current era of rapid development, but also attempts to pinpoint when that era will end. "Most conventional forecasting techniques use a process that assumes the future is going to look like the past—they establish certain relationships between energy and economic activity, and project forward what will be energy uses in the future," explains LBNL staff scientist and report co-author David Fridley. (He is referring specifically to energy forecasts by the International Energy Agency (IEA) and two scenarios prepared by the Energy Research Institute (ERI), a Beijing think tank affiliated with the Chinese government.) Yet the relationship between economic growth and energy demand is not just a straight line. "Nothing can grow exponentially forever."

Current thinking says China's energy demand will only go up and up throughout this century. The LBNL report, however, projects that after rising steeply for the next 15 years, China's energy growth curve will bend and begin to plateau; demand will then peak by 2050 at between 4.5 billion and 5.5 billion tons coal equivalent (depending on the government's success implementing various energy efficiency targets). That is considerably less than the amount if you simply extended other surveys forward. The report forecasts that energy use per person in China will rise to about 40 percent of what Americans consume.

The insights underlying the LBNL forecast are simple. First, the study simply extends further into the future than many forecasts. (The International Energy Agency's most recent "World Energy Outlook" only looks to 2035 and shows no sign of China's energy demand beginning to level off.) Second, their research takes account of what China Energy Group director Mark Levine calls "saturation points." That is the point at which energy demand in a given sector levels off. In a country where still more than half the population is rural, many people have yet to purchase even basic appliances. "But once you have a refrigerator, you don't need another," he says. The concept is simple, but actually integrating it into forecasting requires looking at the dynamics of each sector, and gathering data that can be hard to come by in China. "What makes our model unusual is that we actually account for the specific number and size of refrigerators, televisions, air-conditioners, and more per household," he says. "If you don't do that, you can't know there's a saturation point."

Take, for instance, the energy needs of China's massive infrastructure build-out. Currently 70 percent of China's energy demand is attributable to industry, and of that, fully 40 percent goes into the production of cement and steel. Yet at some point, China won't need to build as many new highways, bridges and parking lots. To envision the future, the LBNL team examined the total mileage of road networks in developed countries with comparable population densities. Then they mapped out just how many additional roads they think China will need—and estimated when the convoys of cement trucks will at last slow down.



7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. jtdwyer 06:36 PM 4/29/11

    Is this the good news, that China's consumption of coal will approximately double over the next 15-20 years and that at some point the demand for construction and manufacturing production will become saturated?

    What percentage of China's population now enjoys modern infrastructure support, cars and cable TV's, etc.? When might this saturation occur? Don't know? Is that the only bad news?

    I sure do feel much better about everything now...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. outsidethebox 07:59 PM 4/29/11

    The most important assumption upon which everything else must be based is what will the Chinese economy (in terms of per capita GDP) look like when it finally stops growing more than a few percent a year. There seems to be this widespread thinking that it will be at a level far lower than ours. Yet look at the Hong Kong SAR - its per capita GDP is a third higher than its former colonial power,Britain. And still growing. Maybe we need to rethink this whole question - only this time without prejudice.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Ralf123 in reply to jtdwyer 11:24 PM 4/29/11

    I'm sure this was done under the cornucopian viewpoint that there will be plenty of oil and coal to fuel China's expansion until then.
    We'll see. Since I started reading theoildrum.com I've seen way more indicators that the energy crunch is coming soon than I care to remember.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jtdwyer in reply to Ralf123 03:34 PM 4/30/11

    That may be true of oil, but coal may be a different matter. Wikipedia says the top 3 producers of coal in 2009 were:

    China . . 3,050 Million tons
    USA . . . . 973
    India . . . 557

    China may be fueling growth with cheap domestic coal for a very long time...

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. OBagle 10:13 PM 4/30/11

    Some of you actually think that China has anything resembling a real economy (implying sustainable growth)? The linchpin in their entire pack of fabrications has already broken. Embezzlement and corruption are the true driving forces of consumption growth, and not surprisingly, at the top of the list are luxury items, such as personal vehicles with no place to park them plus ten hours for a 20 kilometer commute, imported whiskey and brandy when the water supply in the entirety of China is considered far too poisonous to drink, and unbridled prostitution and racketeering when TV only offers shows with "revolution friendly themes".

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. gesimsek 03:54 PM 5/1/11

    A bold eagle preys on small animals and kills quickly. However, a dragon bites and let its prey bleeds into death slowly. Last time the dragon attacked (around 12-13th century), it took 300 years to recover.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. eco-steve 10:18 AM 5/15/11

    Present growth rates expect the consumer to forever haunt luxury shopping malls, whereas reducing ressources will reduce employment giving people more time to participate in new cheap green leisure activities that do not require people to get into very heavy debt.
    China can lead the world through green advertising campaigns.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

China's Energy Dragon Looks Tamer to One Forecaster

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X