China's First Space Lab Tiangong 1 May Launch Soon

The eight-ton experimental prototype is designed as a test bed for the technologies China will need for its future space station program


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr



TIANGONG China is developing its first full-fledged space station, called Tiangong (Heavenly Palace). Early tests of China's skills at rendezvous and docking, shown in this artist's illustration, are set to begin in 2011. Image: China Manned Space Engineering Office

The buzz out of Beijing is that China's Tiangong 1 space lab may fly sooner than expected, perhaps soaring into space by this month's end.

That might be the case, according to China space watcher Gregory Kulacki, a senior analyst and China Project manager at the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS). The Tiangong 1 module ("Heavenly Palace 1" in Chinese) is not China's actual space station—nor will it be a part of the planned Chinese space station, he said.

Rather, the 8-ton experimental prototype is designed as a test bed for the technologies China will need for its future space station program, including docking technology. [Photos: China's First Space Station]

Over the next two years, China is projected to launch three missions to the Tiangong I space lab. The third—and possibly second—mission is expected to carry Chinese astronauts to live and work on the Earth-orbiting facility.

Kulacki has observed that at 8 tons, China's Tiangong 1 is much smaller than the 80-ton U.S. Skylab launched in 1973, or even the 22-ton core module of Russia's Mir Space Station, which launched in 1986. Right now, the International Space Station has grown to tip the scales at 450 tons.

Looking ahead, China currently plans to complete its 70-ton space station in the early 2020s.

"Coincidentally, that is about the time that the ISS is scheduled to be decommissioned. If both those things happen, China's space station will become the de facto new international space station," Kulacki explained in a recent post on UCS's "All Things Nuclear" website.

China's space ambitions
Just what are the ripple effects stemming from China’s push forward in space station construction? Turns out it may be a bit of a Rorschach test.
There are observers that see China's playbook in space, as on the Earth, as a bid to become a world strategic power, not just a regional power.

Indeed, space for China is one piece—a significant piece, but just one—of the puzzle they are assembling, some observers say. Others contend that, when the puzzle is complete, it has China as No. 1 in the world when it comes to space, with no one else in second place.

Yet other analysts put forward that China’s Tiangong 1 is no big deal, a modest increment in space prowess. And there are those that wager China’s foothold in Earth orbit has military meaning. That’s counteracted by specialists who see a new window for U.S.-China space cooperation.

“Some members of Congress may try to use China’s progress in human space flight as an excuse to criticize the Obama administration’s space policy. Some U.S. defense analysts are likely to claim the orbiting space lab has a military purpose,” said UCS’s Kulacki.

But in reality, Kulacki told SPACE.com, Tiangong 1 is just a small step forward along the same path the United States and the Soviet Union crossed decades ago.

"Neither country discovered any practical military advantage from putting people in space. There is no indication China's human space flight program is motivated by the pursuit of military objectives, but even if it is, space professionals in the United States and Russia already know it is a fool’s errand," Kulacki said.

China's steps in space
The launch of Tiangong 1 is another modest step forward in China’s slow-paced but forward-moving human space flight program. [How China's First Space Station Will Work (Infographic)]


TechMediaNetwork

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. bucketofsquid 10:09 AM 8/19/11

    Orbital space as a weaponized platform is far too vulnerable to make sense. As Robert Heinlein pointed out decades ago, a lunar base able to launch large rocks encased in steel would be far more useful and much harder to destroy than something in Earth orbit. It could create detonations on the scale of nuclear weapons without the radiation problems.

    I won't worry until the Chinese start planting a base on the moon. If we aren't ready to do the same at the same time, the brown stinky will hit the propeller hats hard.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. mhenriday 12:49 PM 8/20/11

    Sad - but hardly surprising - that while the article waxes long on speculation regarding possible strategic implications of the impending Chinese launch of a test vehicle, it omits referring to the strange fact that China has been unable to cooperate on such projects as the so-called «International Space Station» (which remains a misnomer, so long as 1/5 of humanity is deliberately excluded) and the reason for this anomaly ; i e, that legislators like Mr Frank Rudolph Wolf have specifically prohibited NASA from cooperating with its Chinese counterparts in any way, shape, or form - to the degree that Chinese journalists were not permitted to attend the official events at the launching of the final space-shuttle mission. A pity that a journal like Scientific American does not dare to even mention such short-sighted and disgusting conduct....

    Henri

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

China's First Space Lab Tiangong 1 May Launch Soon

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X