Chromium in drinking water is carcinogenic
Image: FLICKR/ANDYKET
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
A controversial water contaminant made famous by Erin Brockovich and a small California desert town is carcinogenic.
That conclusion by federal scientists, culminating more than a decade of debate, is likely to trigger new, more stringent standards limiting the amount of hexavalent chromium allowable in water supplies.
It’s been known for about 20 years that people can contract lung cancer when inhaling hexavalent chromium, also known as Chromium VI. But until now, toxicologists have been uncertain whether it causes cancer when swallowed.
National Toxicology Program scientists reported that their two-year animal study “clearly demonstrates” that the compound is carcinogenic in drinking water. Mice and rats contracted malignant tumors in their small intestines and mouths when they drank water containing several different doses of hexavalent chromium.
“I think it’s resolved, as much as it can be resolved,” said George Alexeeff, deputy director of scientific affairs at California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment.
Based largely on the new cancer findings, California and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency officials are reevaluating what concentration is safe in water supplies. Within a few weeks, California is expected to announce a proposal to set a new health guideline.
The Mojave Desert town of Hinkley, population of around 1,900, has the highest levels of hexavalent chromium reported in U.S. ground water. The compound seeped into water there from a Pacific Gas and Electric facility that used it to inhibit rust in cooling towers and discharged it into holding ponds in the 1950s and 1960s.
In 1996, PG&E paid a $333 million settlement to about 600 residents of Hinkley after Brockovich, a law clerk, investigated the contamination and found high rates of cancer and other diseases. The town's plight drew national attention in 2000 from a film based on Brockovich's legal crusade. The payment was the largest tort injury settlement in U.S. history.
The animal study does not prove that people in Hinkley contracted cancer from drinking the tainted water. But it does resolve the debate over whether the contaminant is capable of causing some types of cancer.
Roberto Gwiazda, an assistant researcher at University of California at Santa Cruz’s Department of Environmental Toxicology, called the new study a “milestone,” saying it “settles the issue.”
However, Gwiazda said, using the new research “to support a drinking water standard is a different matter” because extrapolating it to humans remains controversial.
Hinkley’s ground water contained concentrations as high as 580 parts per billion, more than 10 times California’s current drinking water standard of 50 ppb for total chromium compounds. The national standard is 100 ppb.
See what we're tweeting about
7 Comments
Add CommentThe only safe amount is ZERO.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe ONLY safe amount is ZERO.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisRealy, candide? How to you know that? What scientifici proof do you have?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thiskindly suggest recent papers on chromium removal by carbon or any other adsorbent. Dr KM, India
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisHexavalent chromium is also used for tanning hides. As we are discussing contaminated water, we should be examining toxic effects on fish and other aquatic organisms?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisCan anyone tell me if it is possible for hexavalent chromium in drinking be a cause for rectal cancer. My husband is one of 5 children. Between the the ages of 42 and 56, the four youngest children out of the 5 had rectal cancer. Genetic testing was performed and no genetic connection was determined. All 5 children were raised on a dairy farm. My husband recalls using a chemical in the dairy house for cleaning, with the word chromium in it. This would have been from 1958 to 1987.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this"It’s been known for about 20 years that people can contract lung cancer when inhaling hexavalent chromium, also known as Chromium VI. But until now, toxicologists have been uncertain whether it causes cancer when swallowed."
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThis is an out and out lie. If they knew about inhaling it then the next step would have been injesting it. They just didn't tell us!
"scientists reported that their two-year animal study “clearly demonstrates” that the compound is carcinogenic in drinking water. Mice and rats contracted malignant tumors in their small intestines and mouths when they drank water containing several different doses of hexavalent chromium."
“I think it’s resolved, as much as it can be resolved,” said George Alexeeff, deputy director of scientific affairs at California’s Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment."
"The animal study does not prove that people in Hinkley contracted cancer from drinking the tainted water. But it does resolve the debate over whether the contaminant is capable of causing some types of cancer."
Another lie, right there in the article. How can they say that the animal study does not prove that people got cancer from drinking tainted water when they already admitted that it caused malignant tumors in rats and mice and they had to pay all those people who got cancer in Hinkley? The EPA is a joke as is the FDA.
Just more people wasting taxpayer money for NOTHING.