The Middle East and North Africa region is extremely vulnerable to fluctuations in food supplies and prices.
Image: Flickr/Nasser Nouri
If the Arab Spring taught us something, it is that the effects of climate change can serve as stressors, contributing to regional instability and conflict, experts said.
In a report published last week, researchers from the Center for American Progress, the Center for Climate and Security and the Stimson Center examined the role of climate change in the Middle East's upheaval during 2010 and 2011. Looking at long-term trends in rain, crops, food prices and migration, they were able to determine how these factors contributed to social instability in the region.
"The Arab Spring would likely have come one way or another, but the context in which it did is not inconsequential. Global warming may not have caused the Arab Spring, but it may have made it come earlier," the report says.
The Middle East and North Africa region is extremely vulnerable to fluctuations in food supplies and prices. According to the report, with little arable land and scarce water supplies, the region is one of the top food importers in the world.
In 2010, droughts in Russia, Ukraine, China and Argentina and torrential storms in Canada, Australia and Brazil -- all major wheat and grain producers -- considerably diminished global crops, driving commodity prices up. The region was already dealing with internal sociopolitical, economic and climatic tensions, and the 2010 global food crisis helped drive it over the edge.
But the issue here is much bigger. Because of globalization, regional climate events can have a global extent, the report says. What's more, scenarios where weather events unfold economic and political shifts are likely to be repeated as climate volatility, expanding populations and competition for resources disturb national stability, the report says.
National collapse becomes a security threat
According to Michael Werz, senior fellow at the Center for American Progress and one of the authors of the report, the argument here is that there are a number of symptoms -- such as food scarcity, water rationing, crops failure, migration and rapid urbanization -- squeezing the margins of what a society can deal with before exploding.
"This is pushing many societies, especially those with a weak state, to their limits," Werz said.
At the launch of the Arab Spring and climate change report, Werz and other foreign affairs experts discussed the challenges of climate change in global stability -- particularly in terms of food and water security and migration -- and how the United States needs to rethink its foreign policy to incorporate these borderless challenges.
"We've gone from a connected world to an interconnected world, and from an interconnected world to an interdependent world," said New York Times foreign affairs columnist Tom Friedman. "When the world is this interdependent, your rivals failing is much more dangerous than your rivals rising," he said.
According to Friedman, U.S. foreign policy is so caught up in the Cold War model -- of strategic competition between superpowers -- that it's missing the real security issue of the current world.
"We are not worried that Egypt is going to become an ally of the Soviet Union; we are worried that Egypt is going to collapse, which in an interdependent world is a threat," Friedman said.
In a 2011 article in The Atlantic, former Department of State Director of Policy Planning Anne-Marie Slaughter explained how the international environment had changed in the last century.
"The Cold War world was like chess. The 21st century world is more like tennis, where the wind, heat, possible rain delay and your opponent's relative health and form on any given day all affect the speed, trajectory and spin on the ball coming at you," she wrote.
See what we're tweeting about
4 Comments
Add CommentLook, there's no point doing it piecemeal like this. Why not just put a banner headline in every issue saying "IF IT'S BAD, GLOBAL WARMING CAUSED IT!" and save yourselves all this trouble?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe editors had to re-run this article after it was so thoroughly trashed and utterly discredited by commenters that exposed it as a pathetic pandering political garbage masquerade.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisA new disgusting low for censorship at SCIAM. Don't like the comments? Kill the article and re-run it and hopefully you'll get comments that you like. Not this time either. Why don't you editors do your job and find some real science for a change?
Bora must be editing now. He doesn't like your views so he censors them.
Heightened Arab Spring, drought, floods, dogs and cats living together, mass hysteria!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWhy don't you stop whining like a petulant child and go back to your anti-science denialist sites run by fossil fuel industry mouth pieces?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisJust another one of those great mysteries.