Controversial Stem Cell Company Moves Treatment out of U.S.

Celltex Therapeutics of Houston ceased treatment patients in the U.S. last year after a warning from regulators, and will now send patients for treatments to Mexico















Share on Tumblr

stem cells

Relations have soured between Celltex and RNL Bio since December 2011 when they launched their stem cell bank in Sugar Land, Texas. Pictured: human neural stem cells from fetal cortex. Image: Flickr/GE Healthcare

US citizens who had pinned their hopes on a company being able to offer stem-cell treatments close to home will now need to travel a little farther. Celltex Therapeutics of Houston, Texas, stopped treating patients in the United States last year following a warning from regulators. A 25 January e-mail to Celltex customers indicates that the firm will now follow in the footsteps of many other companies offering unproven stem-cell therapies and send its patients abroad for treatment — but only to Mexico.

The stem-cell treatments offered by Celltex involved extracting adult stem cells from a patient, culturing them and then reinjecting them in a bid to replenish damaged tissue. It had been offering the treatment for more than a year — with one of its high-profile customers being Texas governor, Rick Perry — when the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wrote to the company on 24 September 2012 advising it that the stem cells it harvested and grew were more than “minimally manipulated” during Celltex's procedures. As such, the FDA regarded the cells as drugs, which would require the agency's approval to be used in treatments. The FDA also warned that Celltex had failed to address problems in its cell processing that inspectors from the agency had identified in an April 2012 inspection of its cell bank in Sugar Land, Texas. Shortly after it received the letter, Celltex stopped injecting stem cells into patients.

For customers who still had cells banked at Celltex and were wondering how to get them out, things became more chaotic when Celltex and RNL Bio, a company based in Seoul, South Korea, which operated the processing center and bank in Sugar Land, sued each other over financial disagreements. Celltex had to issue a restraining order just to gain access to the cells.

The January e-mail from Celltex reassures customers that their cells are safely stored in a facility in Houston and adds: “We anticipate that we will be able to offer our stem cell therapy services to physicians in Mexico starting very soon!” The e-mail also says that the company is building a new laboratory in Houston, to be opened in March.

Celltex adds that it will carry out an FDA-approved clinical trial, to start “shortly after” a March meeting with the FDA, pending a positive review from the regulator. However, the company had said in a 25 October e-mail to patients that it would start such a trial “within two months” and that patient enrolment could begin in late November.

Leigh Turner, a bioethicist at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, says that the move to Mexico is "not surprising", given the company’s difficulties in the United States.

As Celltex's stem culturing and banking technology was licensed from RNL Bio, it is also not clear whether it has the expertise needed to launch a clinical trial on its own, says Turner. "It would have to build a stem-cell company from the ground floor up. I wouldn’t say it is anywhere near the starting line."

Celltex did not respond to questions about how it would ship stem cells to Mexico or how it would perform the clinical research needed to seek FDA approval.

The January e-mail, however, does attempt to put its customers' minds at ease about their cells. “We hope this gives you confidence that we are taking care of them as the precious material they are," it says.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on January 30, 2013.



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. pknoepfler 07:31 PM 1/31/13

    I believe this development is a big deal. I'm not convinced that moving treatments outside the US is in the best interest of patients. Incidentally, Celltex opening up shop in Mexico was #6 in my stem cell predictions for 2013 on my blog. So far I'm 2 for 2.

    http://tinyurl.com/a9zfodz

    Great piece.
    Paul

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Colinklein 08:04 PM 2/5/13

    David and Paul, predictions withstanding, is this a good or bad thing for the stem cell industry?

    Out of curiousity, I read about a researcher in China who had created a composition to induce stem cells In Situ. I was wondering about your thoughts on this. His name's Dr. Rongxiang Xu, and when I looked him up, I actually found he had a number of very interesting patents under his belt.

    http://bit.ly/12qxESa

    Thanks for the insight, David!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. karl 03:11 PM 2/8/13

    as a mexican I think this are good news, if you get people selling tech in your land, other people in the same branch will get there also (in order to stay where ressources are, if anything).
    on the plus side for Mexico, we can get "free brains" from regulatory pressure somewhere else, if we don't fall to regulationism or fail to be a safe harbor.
    on the down side, we aren't the ones figuring it out.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Controversial Stem Cell Company Moves Treatment out of U.S.

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X