Cover Image: September 2011 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Cooking That Sucks

Vacuum pumps in the kitchen















Share on Tumblr



A tomato consommé Image: Ryan Matthew Smith Modernist Cuisine LLC

Nature, famously, abhors a vacuum. But some cooks have learned to feel differently. Step through the swinging doors at the back of a top restaurant like Alinea in Chicago, and you may find vacuum pumps being used to reduce cooking juices into concentrated sauces, to distill essential oils from fruits and vegetables, to dehydrate chips or to brew coffee.

Many of these techniques originated in chemistry laboratories or industrial food-processing operations, and the equipment involved still evokes the bench sci­entist more than the top chef. But with all those Erlenmeyer flasks, innovative cooks have discovered ways to achieve culinary feats that are impractical by any conventional means.

Consider the common problem of concentrating the flavors and aromas that are in a dilute liquid mixture, such as a broth. The old-fashioned method—a long stovetop simmer to boil off the water—allows many of the most piquant and fragrant compounds to escape with the steam. The kitchen may smell great—but at the cost of a duller sauce. A lengthy sit over the heat also chemically alters many of those compounds that remain, so they no longer taste or smell fresh. A vacuum-reduction setup does a better job because it uses low pressure, rather than high heat, to accelerate evaporation. Pour the liquid into a Pyrex flask that has a side port and connect the flask to a vacuum pump with a rubber hose. Then drop in a magnetic rod, stopper the flask and put it on a hot plate, which uses a spinning magnet to stir and gently warm the broth while the pump reduces the air pressure inside the flask. As the pressure drops, the boiling point of the liquid falls as well; the goal is to sustain a mild, low-temperature boil.

That relatively simple setup greatly reduces chem­ical changes, but it still permits some aromatics to escape through the hose. A more expensive and complex bit of gear, called a rotary evaporator, can capture those vaporized essences and condense them back into liquid form. The cooks at our research kitchen in Bellevue, Wash., use this technique to concentrate apple juice, cabbage juice and vinegar to make a fantastic red coleslaw. Concentrated watermelon juice is also a delight.



Subscribe     Buy This Issue

Already a Digital subscriber? Sign-in Now
If your institution has site license access, enter here.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR(S)

Myhrvold is author and Gibbs is editor of Modernist Cuisine: The Art and Science of Cooking (The Cooking Lab, 2011).


5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. candide 11:34 AM 9/4/11

    "A lengthy sit over the heat also chemically alters many of those compounds that remain, so they no longer taste or smell fresh. A vacuum-reduction setup does a better job because it uses low pressure, rather than high heat, to accelerate evaporation."

    Sometimes the "alteration of compounds" is exactly what the cook wants in a long simmering process.

    Vacuum pumps may have their place - but one cannot simply say that vacuum pumps do a better job across the board.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jsfike 01:12 AM 9/5/11

    But yes, candide, one can simply say "Vacuum pumps do a better job across the board." Go ahead... try it; I'm certain you can do it.
    For the record though, the article never said "vacuum pumps do a better job across the board."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. candide in reply to jsfike 08:26 AM 9/5/11

    "A vacuum-reduction setup does a better job because it uses low pressure, rather than high heat, to accelerate evaporation."

    Not the words I used, but exactly the sentiment.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jaythakar 08:57 PM 9/6/11

    How about using a LYOPHILIZER that will keep the food cool and concentrate. May be by making the kitchen like a lab at NIH we can stimulate US economy and create more jobs!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. candide in reply to jaythakar 08:26 AM 9/7/11

    Why don't we just re-purpose NASA and have them produce Astronaut meals for everyone?

    Hey, let's keep that going - let's shrink an entire meal down to a pill...

    /sarcasm

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Cooking That Sucks: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X