New observations by NASA's Curiosity rover suggest that microbial life could have survived on Mars in the distant past
Deadline: Jun 30 2013
Reward: $1,000,000 USD
This is a Reduction-to-Practice Challenge that requires written documentation and&
Deadline: Aug 31 2013
Reward: $100,000 USD
The Geoffrey Beene Foundation Alzheimer’s Initiative (GBFAI) is launching the 2013 Geoffrey Beene Global NeuroDiscovery Challenge whose
Powered By: 
7 Comments
Add CommentHighly speculative stuff, as you say in the article, but it adds credence to Fred Hoyle's Panspermia hypothesis. I wonder what else he got right? Continuous Creation, perhaps? I read recently that electron/positron pairs can emerge spontaneously out of vacuum - why not hydrogen ions?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI wonder if a Martian rock contained fossils of microscopic organisms with shells (similar to terrestrial diatoms), would Curiosity be able to see them?
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisApriori it seems our biosphere is indigenous.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisThe fastest presented chemical evolution pathways results in biologically evolving cells within ~ 30 000 years (in alkaline hydrothermal vents, either Lane's & Martin's metabolic theory, or thermodynamic RNA replicator crystallization).
Crude estimates of survival rates during late bombardment doesn't quite make up for that IMO.
@BobWalton: Local transpermia would reject Hoyle's cosmological such, which was dead with the acceptance of Big Bang cosmologies anyway. (It assumed an infinitely old universe.)
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs for continuous creation, the observation of the Higgs field regardless of exact Higgs mechanism completes the Standard Model, which safeguards physics up to ~ 100 GeV. So hydrogen creation, which is ~ mass of 1 proton or ~ 1 GeV, is not ongoing.
@ErkkiRuohtula: I imagine so, some species becomes ~ 2 mm in length. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom ; I assume not the colonial ones. ] Curiosity has something like 0.1 mm resolution in some of its microscopes, IIRC.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI forgot: We don't expect such though. They are eukaryotes, such large and energetic (shell building) cells evolved first with the oxygenation of the atmosphere. That didn't happen on Mars.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisTend to forget what we have, and Mars has not, namely a Core, and a Electrical one as well, which, by the way, surports, or, destroys Life. You see, without a vibrant, active Core, were DEAD MEAT, JUST LIKE MARS!!
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this