Could Life Have Evolved on Mars Before Earth?

New observations by NASA's Curiosity rover suggest that microbial life could have survived on Mars in the distant past


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

 


TechMediaNetwork

7 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. BobWalton 04:12 AM 3/14/13

    Highly speculative stuff, as you say in the article, but it adds credence to Fred Hoyle's Panspermia hypothesis. I wonder what else he got right? Continuous Creation, perhaps? I read recently that electron/positron pairs can emerge spontaneously out of vacuum - why not hydrogen ions?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ErkkiRuohtula 04:35 AM 3/14/13

    I wonder if a Martian rock contained fossils of microscopic organisms with shells (similar to terrestrial diatoms), would Curiosity be able to see them?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Torbjörn Larsson, OM 08:22 AM 3/20/13

    Apriori it seems our biosphere is indigenous.

    The fastest presented chemical evolution pathways results in biologically evolving cells within ~ 30 000 years (in alkaline hydrothermal vents, either Lane's & Martin's metabolic theory, or thermodynamic RNA replicator crystallization).

    Crude estimates of survival rates during late bombardment doesn't quite make up for that IMO.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Torbjörn Larsson, OM 08:30 AM 3/20/13

    @BobWalton: Local transpermia would reject Hoyle's cosmological such, which was dead with the acceptance of Big Bang cosmologies anyway. (It assumed an infinitely old universe.)

    As for continuous creation, the observation of the Higgs field regardless of exact Higgs mechanism completes the Standard Model, which safeguards physics up to ~ 100 GeV. So hydrogen creation, which is ~ mass of 1 proton or ~ 1 GeV, is not ongoing.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Torbjörn Larsson, OM 08:33 AM 3/20/13

    @ErkkiRuohtula: I imagine so, some species becomes ~ 2 mm in length. [ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diatom ; I assume not the colonial ones. ] Curiosity has something like 0.1 mm resolution in some of its microscopes, IIRC.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Torbjörn Larsson, OM 08:34 AM 3/20/13

    I forgot: We don't expect such though. They are eukaryotes, such large and energetic (shell building) cells evolved first with the oxygenation of the atmosphere. That didn't happen on Mars.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. pl02vectra 05:17 PM 3/26/13

    Tend to forget what we have, and Mars has not, namely a Core, and a Electrical one as well, which, by the way, surports, or, destroys Life. You see, without a vibrant, active Core, were DEAD MEAT, JUST LIKE MARS!!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Could Life Have Evolved on Mars Before Earth?

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X