Could Robots Become Your Toddler's New Best Friend?

Schoolchildren come to love humanoid classmate after spending five months with him















Share on Tumblr

robot with children

MACHINE AMONG US: Scientists found that a humanoid robot was accepted by a group of toddlers after several months of exposure. Image: FUMIHIDE TANAKA, MACHINE PERCEPTION LAB, UCSD

According to the robotics community, it's unlikely that any robot now on the market could hold your attention for more than 10 hours. (Actually, if you have a robot dog gathering dust on a closet shelf , you probably already know that.)

A new study, however, indicates that this threshold is poised to be broken—at least if the humans interacting with the machines are youngsters. Researchers found that a two-foot- (61-centimeter-) tall metal man easily won over a classroom of tykes, aged 18 to 24 months, who intermittently spent time with it over a five-month period.

"Our results suggest that current robot technology is surprisingly close to achieving autonomous bonding and socialization with human toddlers for significant periods of time," University of California, San Diego, researchers report in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA.

QRIO, a robot programmed with a slew of social functions, was placed in U.C. San Diego's Early Childhood Education Center 45 times over the five-month observation period. For the first 27 sessions, the robot was allowed access to its full arsenal of programmed social behaviors. In addition, a controller could send commands to the humanoid, prompting it to wave, dance, sit, stand, etcetera (although there was a lag time between the prompt and when the robot made the movement).

The tots began to increasingly interact with the robot and treat it more like a peer than an object during the first 11 sessions. The level of social activity increased dramatically when researchers added a new behavior to QRIO's repertoire: If a child touched the humanoid on its head, it would make a giggling noise.

"The contingency coupled with the positive reaction of giggling made clear to the children that the robot was responsive to them and served often to initiate interaction episodes," says study co-author Fumihide Tanaka, a researcher at U.C. San Diego's Institute for Neural Computation and at Sony Intelligence Dynamics Laboratories, Inc.

For 15 sessions midway through the experiment, QRIO was programmed to repeatedly dance to the same song rather than interact with the kids. During these trials, the children became far less interested in the friendly automaton. For the final three sessions, however, QRIO could once again unleash its entire social arsenal.

Tanaka and his colleagues scored the quality of social interaction primarily based on where children touched the robot. A teddy bear and an inanimate toy robot named Robby accompanied QRIO during most of the observation period. The teddy bear was introduced first and prior to the introduction of the robots was very popular. But the stuffed animal was lost in the shuffle when QRIO and Robby came on the scene. Though the toddlers often manhandled Robby, they eventually began touching QRIO in a pattern similar to the way they touched one another—mostly on its arms and hands.

The only time they deviated from this behavior was when QRIO was programmed to giggle, at which point they frequently petted its face and head. Another indication that the little humans viewed robo-kid as a compeer was the way they reacted when QRIO ran out of juice and lay down as if to take a nap: Some of the children would try to wake and help it up, whereas others would cover it with a blanket.

"Our work suggests that touch integrated on the time-scale of a few minutes is a surprisingly effective index of social connectedness," Tanaka says. "Something akin to this index may be used by the human brain to evaluate its own sense of social well-being." He adds that social robots like QRIO could greatly enrich classrooms and assist teachers in early learning programs.



6 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Paulo Sargaço 02:40 PM 11/15/07

    That's very interesting. Maybe I'll give up on my second child and adopt a robot instead.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. j_nickence 02:23 AM 11/16/07

    I can see humanoids like Qiro "installed" in elementary schools across the nation. Interacting with children from kindergarten through eighth grades. The students will possibly share with the robot where they would feel awkward sharing with regular human teachers.
    "Hey, Qiro, I got an A on my math test! Thanks for the help!"

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Rude123 10:25 PM 11/18/07

    We wonder around in Ipod oblivion...spend hours alone online surfing...isn't this welcoming a further disconnect (at an even earlier age, yet) from each other?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. wings65 07:48 PM 11/26/07

    Nothing surprise me anymore. The world has gone mad. Are you a sleep or awake?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. machinegunkellyfan1212 in reply to wings65 09:44 AM 5/5/09

    This article is so cool... If i was a kid(which im not) then i would totally want a robot friend. They are so cool, i'll bet that they are like futuristic IPODS that can hold over 100,000,000 songs, because they have brains that are so massive. If i was a kid(which im not) i would put the same song on the IPOD thing 10,000 times in a row so it would just keep going and going and going and going and going......etc. The robot would also protect me from the day-care bullies, that would come and steal my crackers and crayons(but he wouldn't hurt them too bad) He could also have a projecter that would project an image of my idol. Who is my idol you are wondering, well none other than the notorius Machine Gun Kelly! Anyway i got to get back to the point, this article was really interesting,the fact that they can build robots that interact with kids is TOTALLY OUT OF THIS WORLD, literally because they are robots, thxs 4 reading GO MACHINE GUN KELLY!!!!!!!YAHH

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. machinegunkellyfan1212 in reply to wings65 09:44 AM 5/5/09

    This article is so cool... If i was a kid(which im not) then i would totally want a robot friend. They are so cool, i'll bet that they are like futuristic IPODS that can hold over 100,000,000 songs, because they have brains that are so massive. If i was a kid(which im not) i would put the same song on the IPOD thing 10,000 times in a row so it would just keep going and going and going and going and going......etc. The robot would also protect me from the day-care bullies, that would come and steal my crackers and crayons(but he wouldn't hurt them too bad) He could also have a projecter that would project an image of my idol. Who is my idol you are wondering, well none other than the notorius Machine Gun Kelly! Anyway i got to get back to the point, this article was really interesting,the fact that they can build robots that interact with kids is TOTALLY OUT OF THIS WORLD, literally because they are robots, thxs 4 reading GO MACHINE GUN KELLY!!!!!!!YAHH

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Could Robots Become Your Toddler's New Best Friend?

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X