Cover Image: January 2012 Scientific American Magazine See Inside

Good Health Depends on More Than Great Doctors and Fine Hospitals

Better health requires improved education, more access to nutritious food and greater economic opportunities, new county rankings show















Share on Tumblr



Image: Illustration by Tim Bower

As mayor of Kansas City, Kan., Joe Reardon is justifiably proud of the University of Kansas Medical Center, which has trained several generations of physicians and nurses for more than 100 years. After all, the medical center is consistently rated as the best hospital and treatment center in the state, according to a popular ranking of health institutions. So when Mayor Reardon—who heads the government of both the city and Wyandotte County, in which it sits—first learned that Wyandotte had come in dead last among the state’s counties in a rigorous analysis of health measurements in 2009, he was shocked. “We have great access to excellent health care in a state where some counties have essentially no access,” Mayor Reardon says. “And we’re ranked last out of 105 counties? My first reaction was, ‘How could this be?’”

The answer, Mayor Reardon discovered as he delved into the statistics behind the claim, is that proximity to fine hospitals and first-rate doctors is only one of many factors—and not always the most important—determining how long people live and how vulnerable they are to serious illness. Evidence collected by public health experts over the past few decades repeatedly shows that less obvious forces, including proper diet and exercise, higher levels of education, good jobs, greater neighborhood safety, and underlying support from family and friends, provide a powerful, and often unappreciated, boost to a community’s health and well-being. By the same token, studies demonstrate, a poor showing in any of these areas can sink the health of individuals or of communities—even if they have access to topflight medical facilities.

The goal of the County Health Rankings project, which has given Wyandotte County low marks for health but high praise for its commitmennt to change, is to bring these hidden health factors to light and thereby help elected officials, civic leaders and community groups take concrete steps that can improve the health of local residents. The initiative originated at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, covering solely that state in 2003. A similar project began in Kansas in 2009, and in 2010 the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in Princeton, N.J., provided funding so that the University of Wisconsin could expand its investigation to include within-state comparisons of counties in all 50 states.

Among the biggest lapses identified in Wyandotte County, for example, were much higher than average rates of smoking and obesity, lower than average rates of high school graduation, a distressing number of babies who weigh too little at birth, and a relative scarcity of fresh fruits and vegetables in grocery stores compared with the rest of the state. Mayor Reardon says these measurements have already transformed his approach to budget priorities. Changes include earmarking money for the addition of mentoring programs for high school students, new parks and sidewalks, and the opening of more and better supermarkets and community gardens in impoverished neighborhoods. And that is just the start, Mayor Reardon says. “The measure of our success as a city is not just how many jobs we create but also the health of our citizens.” He believes that potential employers who want to stay competitive in today’s global marketplace are more likely to settle in communities where workers are both highly skilled and relatively healthy.

Public Health Strategy Has Deep Roots
The notion that government officials can use public health statistics to improve policy decisions is not new. In 1854 physician John Snow, one of the founders of modern epidemiology, traced a cholera outbreak in the overcrowded London neighborhood of Soho to a contaminated public water pump by noting how many cases of illness clustered around the pump. (The pump was later found to be too close to a leaking cesspool.) Snow convinced officials to disable the pump, which helped to stop the spread of disease.



5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. oldvic 03:20 AM 12/15/11

    The golden rule of public health must be: avoid the problem, and only treat it if you can't avoid it. The best medical facility is the one that's not needed.
    It's like energy, or any other resource for that matter. Use only what you actually need, and you won't have to worry about recovering it later.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Archimedes 08:09 AM 12/15/11

    With regard to any individual and/or collective problem, the best way to address the same is through organization and a plan. The more intelligent an individual is and the more resources he has, therefore, the more likely that he will successfully address the issue of his personal health care through a successfully organized plan.
    Likewise, the more organized a nation is in providing an plan for it's citizens to address the issue health care, the more successful the nation or other political entity will be with regard to addressing the issue of national health care.
    The U.S.A. has NOT addressed the issue of national health care through an organized efficacious plan.
    Other nations have with the result that health statistics for these nations are much better. Often, these statistics reveal better health care outcomes with significantly lower costs than are present in the laissez faire health care system in the U.S.A. which has, inherently no organization and no plan on a national scale.
    That is why I, personally, favor a single payer form of national health care for all American citizens.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. lamorpa 08:47 AM 12/15/11

    Hold it. You're not saying I myself am responsible for my own health, are you? Hah. The next thing you will be saying is I'm responsible for my financial situation!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. sunnystrobe 06:30 AM 12/21/11

    Species-specific nutrition is the number ONE health care priority for us, nothing else is as significant for national health.
    Professor T. Colin Campbell's 'The China Study' should be in every public library, despite the opposition from Big corporations with vested interests .

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Raghuvanshi1 10:41 AM 12/21/11

    Good health depend on physical and mental exercises,positive out look to life and most important is life long motive for living.If there is life long motive, man can live in any condition even in worse condition joyfully

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Good Health Depends on More Than Great Doctors and Fine Hospitals: Scientific American Magazine

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X