METHANE MACHINES: Farmers are safe for now from a tax on the gas emissions from their livestock.
Image: ISTOCKPHOTO/BRONSWERK
-
The Best Science Writing Online 2012
Showcasing more than fifty of the most provocative, original, and significant online essays from 2011, The Best Science Writing Online 2012 will change the way...
Read More »
House and Senate conferees on the appropriations bill funding U.S. EPA for fiscal 2010 approved an amendment yesterday to block agency efforts to require Clean Air Act permits for greenhouse gases emitted by livestock.
The amendment was agreed to last night as part of the $32.2-billion House–Senate conference package to fund EPA, the Interior Department and the Forest Service for fiscal 2010.
Both chambers had already adopted amendments to their versions of the bill that would have prevented EPA from using funds to implement rules requiring livestock producers to obtain Clean Air Act operating permits for the biological emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other greenhouse gases.
The conference package includes the Senate provision, introduced by Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.); the House had adopted a similar amendment from Rep. Todd Tiahrt (R-Kan.).
Some agriculture groups and farm-state lawmakers are concerned that if EPA moves to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act, the agency may impose a "cow tax" on livestock operations for the methane emissions that result from the flatulence and burps from their cows or pigs.
EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has repeatedly said the agency has no intention to pursue such regulations.
Click here to read the full conference agreement.
Reprinted from Greenwire with permission from Environment & Energy Publishing, LLC. www.eenews.net, 202-628-6500
See what we're tweeting about
3 Comments
Add CommentThe EPA could do better with its share of the 32.2 billion tax payer dollars by regulating flatulence and burps coming out of Washington, D.C.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisGive the war budget to the EPA and our grandchildren might actually have a safe, clean environment to enjoy.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisIf they tax the cows, they should also tax a middle school classroom. Yuk Yuk.
The powers that be, I refer to them as the "eco-twits" are concerned about the nitrogen levels in the Wekiwa River Basin. Next thing you know they will be regulating the dead leaves that fall into the river. You should see the septic tank rules that have been proposed.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisAs for the green house gases emitted by cows, I suspect it has more to do with inactive brain cells (are they herding cattle in the capital?) then global warming.