Curiosity Rover Finds No Methane on Mars--Yet

Living organisms produce more than 90 percent of the methane found in Earth's atmosphere, so scientists are keen to see if the gas is present in Mars's air. The hunt continues


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr

Curiosity landed inside Mars' huge Gale Crater on Aug. 5, kicking off a two-year mission to determine if the Red Planet could ever have supported microbial life. The rover carries 10 different instruments, but SAM is Curiosity's heart, taking up more than half of its science payload by weight.

SAM is designed to detect organic compounds, the carbon-containing building blocks of life as we know it. The mission team hopes to feed the first soil samples into the instrument in the coming weeks.

We should expect to hear much more from Curiosity, and from SAM, as time goes on, scientists said.

"Let me emphasize — these are the first measurements," said Michael Meyer, Curiosity program scientist and lead scientist for NASA's Mars Exploration Program. "We can look forward to more discoveries as the instruments are tweaked, the measurements refined and as we move through time and the seasons of Mars."

Follow SPACE.com senior writer Mike Wall on Twitter @michaeldwall or SPACE.com @Spacedotcom. We're also on Facebook and Google+.

Copyright 2012 SPACE.com, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

2 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. geojellyroll 06:23 PM 11/2/12

    Just an aside..as a geologist I can say you'd get some push back if by stating that living organisms produce more than 90% of the methane in Earth's atmosphere. That's an educated guess.

    Anyways, few biologists expect to find any current living organisms on Mars and, unfortunately from the soil samples so far, we've landed in a poor area for any detection of past life. Doesn't mean we can rule past life out but Curiosity was a dart that hit a discouraging site.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Builder 2010 05:35 PM 11/8/12

    I find it curious that scientists are claiming that so much methane is produced by life on Earth. So where does that leave Titan? Since the moon is almost entirely methane, there must be some pretty significant life processes going on. I've been thinking more and more that most hydrocarbons on Earth are from planet creation processes, not decaying animals. It's simply inconceivable that living organisms of such vast quantities were buried so deeply (miles below the sea bottoms for example) that they could have created the vast reservoirs of hydrocarbons that we keep finding. It seems to me that methane is a natural part of planet creation AND under the extreme temperatures and pressures found deep in the crust combined with the presence of various catalytic materials, could have reformed the methane into long-chain hydrocarbons. When the oil was found near the surface it made sense that it was organic in creation, but the really deep stuff almost defies imagination that the crust pushed dead animals and plants that far into the depths. Then we discover that there's a Saturnian moon that is made almost entirely of this stuff and it certainly wasn't placed there by decaying animals or the flatulence of millions of herd animals.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Curiosity Rover Finds No Methane on Mars--Yet

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X