Image: Skip Talbot
Two pilots took storm chasing to a new extreme last week by chasing supercells from the sky. Caleb Elliott flew Skip Talbot and videographer Phil Bates around severe storms in North Dakota, Nebraska and Kansas.
Chasing from the air is "completely different" than chasing on the ground, Talbot said. In a car "you are limited by the road, the terrain, trees" but "you can get a lot closer... You can really feel the storm when you're on the ground. You can drive up to the tornado. You can get into the hail core. You can smell it. You can feel the wind, the rain."
In comparison, chasers in the closed environment in a plane don't feel the storm [photos].
"All the senses that you get on the ground, you don't get in the airplane..." Though the team didn't capture video of any tornadoes, Talbot said "we saw amazing supercell striation, amazing wall clouds. The views of those things were spectacular and stuff I've never really seen before from that vantage point."
To no surprise for more lily-livered ground-dwellers, Talbot, a 28-year-old computer programmer in Chicago, said that the team's first experiences with aerial storm chasing were more demanding than he thought they would be.
"When we hit turbulence, it was the kind that made you sick," Talbot said. "I got so green I was almost useless, but other than that, it was an awesome experience with fantastic views."
Elliott, a professional pilot out of Kansas City, Mo., agreed. "It's a very rare opportunity to see nature in full force, and be right up there with it, but there is a lot of tension due to the fact of how close to [the storms] you are. You are within a mile of a massive supercell thunderstorm. It can get very dangerous and deadly in a matter of seconds."
Just how dangerous is this?
The obvious question for Elliott and Talbot is, "Are you crazy?" People already criticize the storm chasing community for the number of risks they take and the example they are setting for non-chasers.
"Flying near or around storms on purpose for chasing is in my opinion rather absurd," a Facebook fan of Elliott's commented on his page. "Its [sic] better to be safe on the ground than in the air in trouble wishing you were on the ground."
Talbot disagreed.
"Whenever you try something new and push the envelope, its going to be absurd and dangerous to others," Talbot replied. "Think of the risks the first pilots took, and what we wouldn't have today if it weren't for them. Plenty of good pilots died along the way, but they knew the risks going in and they followed their dreams."
"STORM CHASING IS DANGEROUS NO MATTER WHERE YOU ARE," Elliott responded to the poster.
By phone, Elliott expanded on that statement. "It's very dangerous," Elliott said. "I don't condone any of this. I know what my experience is and I'm comfortable with it. It is dangerous and nobody needs to be doing it."
Not many people are qualified to do what Elliott and Talbot do either.
"Ninety percent of pilots know nothing about severe weather," Elliott estimated. "Ninety percent of storm chasers know nothing about flying an airplane."
Both men are trained storm spotters for the National Weather Service. Both are pilots. Both have long resumes of storms chased.
See what we're tweeting about
5 Comments
Add Commentsounds like the gene pool's about to receive a cleaning ...
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisWith so many easy answers to why not, I salute these brave men for seeing why and for facing the calculated risks of doing what they do. I hope their efforts are rewarded with cloudbreaking new discoveries.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisgood to hear. <a href="http://periodictablecharges.com ">periodic table with charges</a> I hope their efforts are rewarded with cloudbreaking new discoveries.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thishttp://periodictablecharges.com
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI just finished teaching "Jonathan Livingston Seagull" to my high school students. I'd say go ahead and challenge.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this