From Nature magazine

Researchers say that technology to shuffle genetic material between unfertilized eggs is ready to make healthy babies. The technique could allow parents to minimize the risk of a range of diseases related to defects in the energy-producing cell organelles known as mitochondria.

Mitochondrial defects affect an estimated 1 in 4,000 children, and can cause rare and often fatal diseases such as carnitine deficiency, which prevents the body from using fats for energy.

They are also implicated in a wide range of more common diseases affecting children and adults, such as multiple sclerosis and Parkinson’s disease. Mitochondria have their own DNA and are inherited only from the mother, so replacing defective mitochondria in eggs from mothers who have a high risk of passing on such diseases could spare the children.

Three years ago, a team led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov, a reproductive biologist at Oregon Health and Science University in Beaverton, created eggs with donor mitochondria that developed into healthy rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). Today, the same team reports the creation of human embryos in which all of the mitochondria come from a donor. The method needs to be tweaked to increase efficiency and gain regulatory clearance, but it is ready for the clinic, says Mitalipov. “You can expect the first healthy child to be born [using this method] within three years.”

Mix and match
Just as they did with the monkeys, Mitalipov and his colleagues removed the nucleus from an unfertilized egg, leaving behind all of that cell’s mitochondria, and injected it into another unfertilized egg that had had its nucleus removed. They then fertilized the egg in vitro.

In the previous experiment, the team proved in convincing fashion that the fertilized monkey eggs were good — by implanting them in uteri, where they produced four healthy offspring. To evaluate the results with human cells, the researchers had to settle for developing the embryos to the blastocyst stage — a ball of about 100 cells. They used cells from the blastocysts to produce embryonic cell lines, and then carrying out various tests on them. The cells looked like those from normal embryos, but with mitochondria exclusively from the donor.

David Thorburn, a specialist in the genetics of mitochondrial disorders at the University of Melbourne in Australia, is “surprised and impressed” by the work. He is particularly happy that the team followed up the monkeys to track any long-term effects of the DNA transfer. None have been seen. Mitalipov’s group also used monkey cells to show that the technique works with eggs that have been frozen — something that will be crucial in the clinic.

Thorburn is not convinced that the technology is ripe for clinical use. He would like to see more data from the monkeys, including whether animals bred using the technique can successfully have their own babies, and more data on possible abnormalities that can arise during development in both the monkey and human embryos.

But if it does move forward, there will be “hundreds of families worldwide wanting to make use of the technology” each year, he says.

Egg anomalies
Mitalipov agrees that mysteries remain. Some 50% of the human eggs underwent abnormal fertilization, in which excess maternal nuclear DNA remained — a problem seen much less frequently in the monkeys or in controls. “It looks like human oocytes are more sensitive,” he says. Mitalipov hypothesizes that “incomplete meiosis” — splitting of the cells — caused the problem, and he is now tweaking the method. But even so, some 20% of the eggs produced embryos that would have been suitable for transfer to the uterus.

3 Comments

1. 1. ErkkiRuohtula 11:09 PM 10/24/12

   Does there have to be three people involved? If the father supplies also the mitochondria, the baby will have two parents as usual. This would make the procedure easier to accept.

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

2. 2. smcristea 07:26 AM 10/25/12

   SO COOL!
   

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this

3. 3. MadScientist72 in reply to ErkkiRuohtula 08:48 AM 10/25/12

   Unfortunately, it wouldn't work that way, for 2 reasons:
   (1)In the method used in this paper, the "mitochdria donor" actually supplies all parts of the egg cell except the nucleus. The "mother" is really a "nucleus donor". To do this with a cell from the father, one of his stem cells would have to be "reprogrammed" into an egg - a technology we don't currently have - which would make the process more complicated and expensive.
   (2)Through a process that's not fully understood, mitochondria from sperm cells are destroyed by the egg during normal fertilization. There's currently no reason to belive that it would be different for male mitochondria in a stem cell-derived engineered "egg".

   Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this