Does damp or wet weather really make arthritis pain worse? If so, how?















Share on Tumblr

Donald A. Redelmeier, a professor of medicine at the University of Toronto, explains.

People with arthritis often believe that changes in the weather cause flare-ups of their disease. Decades of medical research, however, have failed to establish an objective relationship between arthritis severity and weather patterns. Moreover, detailed interviews with specific patients have yielded mostly anecdotes, and those who move to drier climates do not report major relief.

The specific idea of dampness affecting arthritis symptoms seems an unlikely mechanism for a number of reasons. The skin surrounding joints is rather impervious to water and most people stay dry indoors during rain anyway. In addition, arthritis patients do not experience dramatic changes in their symptoms when immersed in water (such as during baths or swimming). Wet weather may also be associated with other climatic conditions, such as decreases in barometric pressures. But even this connection seems implausible, given that much greater pressure swings are tolerated easily during plane travel or mountain driving in a car.

Another weather component is humidity, which might enter the body through the respiratory tract. But this seems an unlikely contributor because hospitalized patients are often given humidified air to breathe and this has little apparent effect on arthritis conditions. Furthermore, a long shower does not usually induce arthritis pain.

None of the past studies investigating this link is flawless; hence, the possibility remains that a small association does exist between changes in the weather and flares in arthritis pain. Small associations would not explain the strength and popularity of the belief, however, considering that people do not reliably detect small correlations. In fact, studies from psychology suggest that people often see patterns even where none exist. A prime example is the capacity to visualize outlines of animals in overhead clouds. An even more compelling example is people's belief in streak basketball shooting even when scoring patterns follow a random sequence.

The episodic nature of both arthritis pain and the weather can further encourage spurious beliefs because multiple components and time lags are possible with each element. By random chance, some days of dramatic weather will be followed by pain. Moreover, a single big coincidence is unforgettable. Over the years people may pay more attention to confirming evidence, neglect contrary evidence, and misinterpret ambiguous evidence thereby entrenching the belief. In contrast, a scientific approach would require a more rigorous search and recording of contrary information.

Another axiom of science is dispassionate observation. Achieving this standard in clinical medicine often requires blinding, so that neither clinicians nor patients know what exposure is active. Failures of blinding allow conscious or subconscious factors to distort reporting. With the weather, of course, it's hard to be blind.

Extinguishing the belief in a link between weather patterns and arthritis flare-ups requires a randomized trial, yet such a study is unlikely to be feasible anytime soon. Moreover, the failure to find a difference in such a trial might not be fully convincing because those who still believe in the correlation might claim that the participants were insufficient in number or unrepresentative of their experience.

Ultimately, peoples' belief about wet weather and arthritis may reveal more about the workings of the mind than the body. Indeed, the innate tendency to identify patterns and discount randomness has evolutionary benefits because predictability can often be turned to advantage, whereas randomness is hard to exploit.

Answer originally published September 6, 2004.



5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Gwenart 06:46 AM 12/16/07

    The pain of arthritis seems to be related to the change in barometric pressure rather dampness I think. G. de Silva

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. jasimobaid 05:39 PM 1/21/08

    this could cause flare of certain types of arthritis and possibly through indirect way,rheumatoid arthritis is worse by infection.psychological factors.rheumatic fever is flared at the onset of damp wet weather possibly because of high rate of streptocooccal infection with damp and hot weather.
    weather do affect joint symptoms hot bag has a therapeutic role in degenerative arthritis,on the other hand cold weather cause arthragia

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. dgknight 08:35 AM 3/15/09

    Instead of "damp" weather, there seems to be a correlation with arthritis flares and barometric pressure.
    In a Harvard Health Publication from 2007, it sited tests done on human and rats in controlled enviroments...the findings: arthritic rats appeared to suffer more pain with lowering of the barometric pressure; middle-aged and older people with osteoarthritis noted little or no effect of weather on their joint symptoms; and, among people with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who believed strongly that there was a connection between weather and arthritis analysis of symptoms and weather changes demonstrated little or no effect.

    There are more than 100 types of arthritis -- it is possible that different types of arthritis will respond differently to changes in barometric pressure.

    Even though the results were inconclusive, in my personal case, there is a correlation between low barometric pressure and arthritis pain.
    I'm polyarthritic and the pain increases significantly just before a drop in pressure, and recedes once the pressure stabilizes.

    Since the studies focused on only two different types of arthritis,(rheumatoid and osteo) perhaps different types of arthritis are more sensitive to changes in
    pressure.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. pgtruspace 03:01 AM 6/7/09

    My own 50 year experience with rheumatoid arthritis is inactivity and cold makes it worse. Heat brings relief and physical activity covers it up. As to barometric pressure I don't know, don't have a barometer. Just some mornings are a lot worse then others.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. tommyoctober 05:05 PM 1/4/12

    A concept that often applies to pains in the body, especially that in an area where a bone was broken and now has healed but yet the patient can determine when it will rain is the coefficient of expansion. When a broken bone heals the resulting callus and new bone formation has a different coefficient of expansion than the surrounding bone. This is an explanation of the degenerative bone and cartilage associated with arthritis. The C.O.E. also explains why there were so many attempts made in the dental profession to find the correct amalgam to fill a drilled out cavity. You may remember when gold had that quality but became cosmeti-cally unattractive and very expensive. Gold would expand at the same rate as the surrounding tooth when both were exposed to extremes of temperature.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

Does damp or wet weather really make arthritis pain worse? If so, how?

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X