Don't Buy Those Expensive Jeans--Lease Them Instead

A new program in the Netherlands helps you eliminate wasteful spending on clothes. Instead of owning a pair of jeans for life, you can now just keep them for a year before you send them back to be recycled so you can try something new.


Fast Company













Share on Tumblr

Don't Buy Those Expensive Jeans--Lease Them Instead

Don't Buy Those Expensive Jeans--Lease Them Instead Image:

By Ben Schiller

A new program in the Netherlands helps you eliminate wasteful spending on clothes. Instead of owning a pair of jeans for life, you can now just keep them for a year before you send them back to be recycled so you can try something new.

Companies normally use a leasing model for durable goods, such as cars or heavy machinery. But Dutch entrepreneur Bert van Son thinks it could have a role for other products, too--like jeans.

A few weeks ago, Van Son, who owns a small line called Mud Jeans, launched a new service allowing people to rent, rather than buy, his products. He figured that he might not make much money up-front. But it might allow him to gather valuable fabric after use, and perhaps cement loyalty with his customers.

"We thought it must be possible to get our jeans back somehow, and reuse them in the recycle process," he says. "So, we thought, 'Why not stay the owner of the jeans and let people use the jeans, rather than owning them?'"

Customers pay a one-off 20 euro fee ($27), covering shipment and admin, and then 5 euros a month for a year (80 euros in total). At the end of the contract, they have three options. They can send the jeans back. They can get a new pair, paying a reship cost and the lease fee. Or, they can choose to keep the jeans, paying another four months at 5 euro plus a further 20 euro deposit. That goes towards another pair, when they eventually need one. Since launching in January at a jazz club in Amsterdam, several hundred people have signed up.

The jeans are made of a high-end organic cotton from Turkey, which is "quite expensive" and hard to source. So, it makes sense to increase the proportion of recycled, or off-cut, material. At the moment, that's about about 40%. But Van Son thinks he could get it to about 50%, if he gets the leasing scheme right (it's not possible to go fully recycled, as long, virgin, strands are needed initially).

When the jeans come back from the user, they are either washed, repaired, and put back into service, or shredded and sent back to the factory. "Cotton is a very big polluter in our world. Even organic cotton uses a lot of water. So, if there is a way of helping, it's good," Van Son says.

He doesn't expect to make a lot of money--though it's early, and it's possible publicity will give it a boost. "I had a hard time talking the bankers through this concept," he says.




Fast Company Copyright 2013 by Fast Company. Reprinted with permission.


Comments

Add Comment
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Don't Buy Those Expensive Jeans--Lease Them Instead

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X