Double Stars Succumb to Fatal Attraction

A new model suggests that short-period binary stars are rare because they tend to merge into one















Share on Tumblr

binary stars

Short-period binary stars, such as the Sirius system, risk merging together in their early years of existence. Image: NASA/ESA/G. Bacon (STScI)

By Ken Croswell of Nature magazine

Many single stars may have been born as two separate suns, which merged into one during the first million years of their life. That is the unexpected finding from a computer simulation of binary stars in a young star cluster.

Double stars are common. For example, Sirius, the brightest star visible in the night sky, consists of two stars that orbit each other every 50 years.

Studies of star-forming regions indicate that binary stars start off with a uniform distribution of orbital periods: the number of binaries younger than a few million years that orbit each other every 1–10 years, 10–100 years, 100–1,000 years, and so on, is about the same

Older binaries show a different pattern. The most common orbital period for double stars outside of star-forming regions is about 200 years, and both shorter and longer periods are rarer.

The scarcity of binaries with longer orbital periods is easy to explain: to have a long orbital period, the stars must be quite far apart. For two stars with a total mass adding up to that of the Sun, a 200-year orbital period would put them about as far from each other as the Sun is from Neptune or Pluto. Stars at much greater distances feel little of each other's gravity, so the gravitational tug of a passing star can disrupt the system and break it apart.

Inward spiral
But where did the short-period binaries go? In a paper in Astronomy and Astrophysics, three astronomers in Germany report how they simulated a star cluster resembling that in the Orion Nebula, the best-known stellar nursery. Their model assumes that as two stars close together in a binary system whirl around each other, they interact with the gas in the cluster. The interactions can modify the stars' orbits, causing them to spiral towards each other until they merge and become a single star.

"It was quite astonishing," says Thomas Kaczmarek, an astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy in Bonn, Germany, and a co-author of the paper. "We just took the parameters that we needed from this cluster, and what came out is that we almost perfectly get this period distribution observed in the field."

Steven Stahler, an astronomer at the University of California, Berkeley, who studies star formation, approves of the work. "It's plausible," he says, but adds that proving the idea correct will be difficult. The same gas and dust that cause the close-in binaries to merge also prevent their visible light from reaching Earth. Astronomers must conduct observations using infrared radiation, which penetrates the dust, but often requires space-based observatories to detect.

In one unique case, astronomers have actually watched two stars in the constellation Scorpius spiral together. The merger sparked a bright flare of light called a red nova, and a similar eruption inside a young star cluster could show that young binaries do indeed merge. However, the Scorpius binary didn't belong to a star cluster, and Stahler thinks that a merger inside a gas-filled cluster might be too gentle to unleash a nova.

Could the Sun have been born as two separate stars that later merged? "It could have happened, but I think it would be a bit far-fetched," says Susanne Pfalzner, an astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy and a co-author of the latest paper. She suspects that a merger would have disturbed the newborn Sun's planet-forming disc, preventing the birth of rocky worlds including Earth.

This article is reproduced with permission from the magazine Nature. The article was first published on September 25, 2012.



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. junior144 03:24 AM 9/26/12

    oh bull

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. HubertB 02:37 PM 9/26/12

    What way they would go would depend on how they were spinning. Energy from the earth's rotation is slowly increasing the distance of the moon from the earth. (As it does, it causes the day to get slightly longer.) If both stars were rotating rapidly, that could cause them to move apart as it slows down their rate of rotation. That could increase the size of their orbits around their center of mass.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. HubertB 04:54 AM 9/30/12

    Grant money with strings attached has nothing to do with a rotating binary star system. At close levels such as the earth-moon system, the transfer of rotational energy to gravitational energy can be measured by lasers using mirrors left behind by astronauts. The measurements conform to that predicted by using the Gravitational Section of Einstein's Theory of Relativity. It is at Galactic levels where dark matter slurps up Grant Money.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Double Stars Succumb to Fatal Attraction

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X