Easter Island Statues Might Have Been "Walked" Out of Quarry

A contentious theory was recently put to the test with an almost life-size replica















Share on Tumblr

moai

Researchers have used a replica moai to show how the giant statues may have been "walked" to where they are displayed. Image: Courtesy of Carl Lipo

By Ewen Callaway of Nature magazine

Easter Island’s gargantuan stone statues walked. That is the controversial claim from archaeologists who have demonstrated the feat with a 4.4-tonne model of one of the baffling busts. They describe their work in the Journal of Archaeological Science.

Nearly 1,000 statues litter Easter Island's 163 square kilometers, with the largest weighing 74 tons and standing 10 meters tall. Much about the megaliths is mystery, but few of the enigmas are more perplexing than how the statues were shuttled kilometers from the rock quarries where they were carved.

Archaeologists have proposed that the Polynesians who settled Easter Island 800 years ago or more laid the statues (called moai) prone and rolled them along on logs. That idea supports the theory that the settlers, known as Rapa Nui, became so obsessed with statue-building that they denuded the island of its forests. In his book Collapse (Viking, 2005), Jared Diamond, a geographer at the University of California, Los Angeles, touted Easter Island as the poster child for a civilization that blew through its natural resources and folded.

“It’s a great story but the archaeological evidence doesn’t really support it,” says Carl Lipo, an archaeologist at California State University, Long Beach, whose team instead proposes that the Rapa Nui 'walked' the moai by rocking them from side to side, as one might move a refrigerator.

Made to walk
Some statues are found on stone pedestals; others are in incomplete forms along roads or in a quarry. The incomplete statues — which Lipo says would have been modified once they reached their pedestals — lean noticeably forward, in a posture that doesn't lend itself to horizontal transport, says Lipo. Broken moai along roads, which were presumably abandoned, also point to vertical transport. On roads that slope upwards away from the quarry, the statues lie on their backs, whereas downwards-sloping roads tend to be littered with face-planted moai, Lipo notes.

Lipo and Terry Hunt, an archaeologist at the University of Hawaii in Honolulu, noted these points in their contentious book The Statues That Walked (Free Press, 2011; see 'Anthropology: Head to head'). A US television program later asked the pair to test their hypothesis with a life-size model. With the help of a ship-building company, they constructed a 3-metre-tall concrete model of one of the statues.

The researchers had no clue how to get the model walking. “An aeronautical engineer can explain why a plane flies, but you don’t want one flying a plane,” says Lipo. “Here we have this giant 5-ton thing, now figure out how it actually moves. It was quite frustrating.”

The statue could not stand on its own and had to be rested on supports. But after several trying days, a team of 18 people chanting “heave-ho” managed to get the thing walking with three hemp ropes — one tied to it from behind to keep the statue from falling on its face and two on either side (see video). “It really hauls,” says Lipo: the team got the statue to travel 100 meters in under an hour. Lipo suggests that a small number of people working part time could efficiently transport moai, questioning a scenario in which Easter Island's population ballooned and later crashed, as Diamond and others have proposed.



9 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. alan6302 08:20 PM 10/24/12

    The methods used to carve a statue have never been remotely established. the stone tools found on site had nothing to do with the construction.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. geojellyroll 08:22 PM 10/24/12

    I like history but not sure of the point of all this.

    If the statues are capable of being moved in this method, it doesn't mean they weren't moved via another method. It's a fun exercise but not much otherwise.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. jschmidt2 12:53 PM 10/25/12

    Perhaps the population collapsed under the falling statues.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. kevin_neilson 01:59 AM 10/26/12

    I like the idea. If the center of gravity is a little forward of the base, then tipping it to the side will cause it to automatically move forward and sideways, and all you need to do is keep it swinging back and forth. No logs required. This doesn't disprove the theory that they probably still totally destroyed their island.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. hungry doggy 04:52 PM 10/26/12

    I suppose that a thousand years from now archeologists will examine the statues on Easter Island. They will find one five ton statue that was built in the early 21st century. From this they will conclude that statue building must have persited into the 21st century but that only one statue of that era survived. They will most likely conclude that the inhabitants of Easter Island probably were still building and transporting the statues in the year 2012 in order to worship the ancestors.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. Daniel35 08:59 PM 10/27/12

    It didn't say where the concrete statue was constructed.

    Wasn't there also evidence that at one time they had a large forest that was cut down, that had given shade required for some crops?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. ankank 08:51 AM 10/31/12

    This is almost certainly how they were moved. In the island legends, the statues 'walked'. An added wrinkle to the technique is to strap logs on either side of the statues so that the log ends protrude further than the base of the statue, then you can 'walk' it more easily on the log 'legs' and very rapidly. I think Thor Heyerdal showed this in the 1950s. So quite what these experimenters think they are proving, the heck knows!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. hiranoor 10:58 PM 2/17/13

    I love the history and your article is giving history to us or it is amazing article about stone statues....
    <a href="http://www.infokorners.com"> beauty tips and hairstyles</a>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. hiranoor 12:09 PM 3/15/13

    I like your website and information given by you
    <a href="http://www.sanamjung.com/">VJ sanam Jung pics</a>

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Easter Island Statues Might Have Been "Walked" Out of Quarry

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X