E-noses Could Make Diseases Something to Sniff at

Diagnosing illnesses could be as easy as breathing.















Share on Tumblr



THE NOSE KNOWS: Bill Hanson of the University of Pennsylvania uses an electronic nose to analyze exhaled breath for possible disease. Image:

Ancient medical practitioners plied their trade by trusting their noses. They knew that diabetes could make a patient's breath smell sweet and that a wound emitting a foul odor was infected. These early doctors, lacking today's sophisticated technology, often relied on their sense of smell to diagnose illness.

Technology is now turning this ancient art into a modern science. Engineers are developing electronic versions of the human nose that will allow doctors, ever in search of less-invasive techniques, to tap into what the nose knows about the human body.

"The sense of smell has been used as a medical diagnostic tool for thousands of years," says Bill Hanson, an anesthesiologist and critical care specialist at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia, who has studied whether odor can be used to diagnose an ailment. "Both diseases and bacteria that cause diseases have individual and unique odors. You can walk into a patient's room and know immediately in some cases that the patient has such and such bacteria just because of the odor."

The "odor signatures" of disease arise through one of several mechanisms. Bacteria, like all living organisms, give off unique mixtures of gases; bacterial infections may be diagnosed by the characteristic scents of these gases. Alternately, nonbacterial disorders, such as diabetes, may prompt biochemical changes that alter the smell of a patient's body. But many of these odors may be tough for the humans to detect and identify.

"The difference between normal breath and diseased breath may be very subtle," says David Walt, a chemist at Tufts University in Boston who designs chemical sensors and devices.

Enter the electronic nose, an emerging technology that can distinguish these subtle differences. There are a variety of electronic e-nose models, all of which consist of an array of olfactory sensors that are activated in unique patterns when exposed to different aromas; software identifies each odor and its source by analyzing the patterns. (The human brain uses this same pattern-recognition process to identify smells.)

Though the technology was originally designed for other tasks, such as sniffing out chemical leaks or detecting food spoilage, research is increasingly revealing its diagnostic potential. Physicians can effectively identify potential lung cancer patients, for instance, by "smelling" their breath.

"When you have an exhaled breath, there are all sorts of volatile organic compounds that are produced," says Serpil Erzurum, a pulmonologist at Cleveland Clinic and co-author of a 2005 study on the use of electronic noses to help diagnose lung cancer. "Those compounds are a result of metabolism and, when you have cancer, metabolism changes and the volatile organic compounds are altered. The changes are detectable by an electronic nose."

Hanson showed that the technology is useful for diagnosing chronic sinusitis and pneumonia, and other researchers proved that the noses can distinguish asthmatic patients from healthy ones.

And the noses don't just analyze breath. Some can also sniff out infections in urine, blood and other bodily fluids. A team of British scientists, for instance, used electronic noses to pinpoint antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the nasal swabs of hospital patients.

Combine these feats with the fact that artificial noses are faster, cheaper and less invasive than many other diagnostic tests, and it is easy to understand why physicians find the technology appealing. Erzurum says it could make a dramatic difference in the success of treatments, paving the way for early detection of lung cancer and other diseases.

"Some of the newer nose technologies are very portable," Hanson says. "They're suitable to being taken to the bedside and being handheld. You can imagine a patient breathing into one of these and getting a fast, inexpensive answer to a question you might have."



4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. ColinB 12:04 AM 1/12/08

    I give up. Aren't dogs cheaper? Once you know there is something to detect, it's got to be cheaper to train and house a dog than to buy an electronic nose and the software and hardware to support it.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ek4scientist 06:42 AM 1/14/08

    smell of human feces is helpful to diagnose

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. dsatch 02:52 AM 1/15/08

    Agree w/ ColinB- cheaper soln. a dog- mine can always smell wound, infection , etc

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. Jim Ryan 07:21 AM 11/13/08

    I work in a different home almost daily. I can tell when someone in the home has the flu, by the air in the home,--if the home is closed to the outside. I recently went to a home where the woman told me her husband had pancreatic cancer. When I entered the home, there was a smell that wasn't harsh and yet, one could tell there was an overpowering difference that seemed as a veil thruout the entire home.

    The woman would cry at any thought of her husband. They have been married for 62 years. I am worried about her--living in the home with her husband dying--her worries, stresses--love for him and the smell. I submit a parallel as to why the woman should at the least, air her house out daily and that is,--ask any fishermen that has a live-well in his boat--where he catches live bait and keeps them alive for some time. If just one of the live baits dies and is not taken out of the live-well, the rest of the live baits die with a little time.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

  • huler Trying, failing to spend money on Delta Airlines. Unnavigable website. 2+ hours hold time. But -- they promise to call me when it's my turn.
    8 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • tvjrennie @DrBondar @docfreeride If we can't all be in same city at once, would tele-partying suffice? Virtual debauchery?
    30 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
  • docfreeride Better-half reconstructing "License to kill Mad Men", a cocktail that melds a Vesper Martini w/ rye. High proof = hard to recall accurately.
    41 minutes ago · reply · retweet · favorite
More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

E-noses Could Make Diseases Something to Sniff at

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X