Emotional Smarts Tied to General IQ

The same brain regions that perform cognitive tasks may also provide social intelligence, according to a new study


TechMediaNetwork













Share on Tumblr



Social abilities and general intelligence may be controlled by the same regions of the brain, new research suggests Image: Goodluz | Shutterstock.com

Emotional smarts and general intelligence may be more closely linked than previously thought, new research suggests.

In a group of Vietnam veterans, IQ test results and emotional intelligence, or the ability to perceive, understand and deal with emotion in oneself or in others, were linked. And in brain scans, the same regions of the brain seemed to perform both emotional and cognitive tasks, the study found. The findings were published in the journal Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience.

"Intelligence, to a large extent, does depend on basic cognitive abilities, like attention and perception and memory and language," said study coauthor Aron Barbey, a neuroscientist at the University of Illinois, in a statement. "But it also depends on interacting with other people. We're fundamentally social beings and our understanding not only involves basic cognitive abilities but also involves productively applying those abilities to social situations so that we can navigate the social world and understand others."

In the past, scientists believed that emotional intelligence and general intelligence were distinct, and books and movies are rife with depictions of intellectually brilliant but socially clueless nerds.

But Barbey and his colleagues wondered whether emotional intelligence and IQ were more tightly coupled than previously thought. To find out, the team used emotional intelligence, and intelligence tests drawn from 152 Vietnam veterans.

Barbey's team found that as IQ test scores went up so did measures of social abilities.

Next, they studied brain scans from the veterans. Participants had suffered injuries in different parts of the brain, so the researchers created a map of the brain, then broke it into tiny sections. They then compared emotional and general intelligence test results between those with and without injuries for each individual section.

Those with brain injuries in the frontal cortex and the parietal cortex had impairments in both general and emotional intelligence. The frontal cortex plays a key role in regulating behavior, planning and memory, while the parietal cortex plays a role in understanding language. 

The findings suggest that social savvy and general smarts are more tightly connected than previously thought.

Copyright 2013 LiveScience, a TechMediaNetwork company. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.


TechMediaNetwork

12 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. ultimobo 05:07 PM 1/23/13

    interesting - I've been told I have a high IQ, but I consistently fail with the EQ.

    My partner may not be so high IQ, but is very high EQ.

    Together we rock - but I'm not sure either of is high in both categories.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. OlgatheGreat 06:40 PM 1/23/13

    Necessary but not sufficient? The only thing they showed was that not being smart means you're less likely to be emotionally smart. There is no mention of how many smart people are NOT high in eq.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Adam_Smith 06:30 AM 1/24/13

    The report uses "emotional intelligence" and "social intelligence" interchangeably. Is that the understanding of the researchers? It seems to me that there are some forms of emotional intelligence, such as coping with loss or stress or with deferring gratification that are basically individual. I hope that the researchers were working with more precise definitions of "emotional intelligence" and "social intelligence" than are evident in this report.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. sjdrake 01:19 PM 1/24/13

    If you would like to watch the video created by the Beckman Institute that features this research, you can watch it on YouTube at...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t2AXbFAtX2Y

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. goscuter1 09:49 PM 1/26/13

    This is comical, on some level. The human species has IQs advanced enough to put men on the moon, build grand and complex engineering structures as well as develop intricate electronics; we can video-talk in near real time with any other person on the planet; we can break the speed of sound whilst on the ground, in the air or on water; we developed penicillin, split the atom, came up with evolution; and all of this was achieved in spite of the heavy boot of religion driving Humanity back - ever backward - into the Dark Ages which, in some ways, we've never emerged from.

    We have the IQs that afforded us the capacity to feed the globe three times over and yet two billion are starving; we have the capacity to bring safe drinking water and nutrition to every disadvantaged child on the planet (it would be to our advantage) and yet 30,000 children under the age of 5 die every single day; we have the capacity to rid the world of most remaining diseases in short order were it not for there being too much $ in treatment; we have the capacity to reconnect our disconnected Humanity but instead, the rich get richer hoarding whilst the poor die in their millions.

    We have EQs so retarded we imagine insanity like revenge (and it's conservative twin, justice) to be sane; we imagine subscription to religious hatred to be sane; we imagine politeness to be sane and worst of all our insanities, we imagine lying to be sane.

    Mothers lie to their children, for their sake. They're protected from knowledge, for their sake. States do the same thing with citizens, for the peoples' sake. We lie to each other for each others' sake. We breed children not to be happy but to be our slaves.

    Girls who are honest about their biological coding get acid thrown in their face in many parts of the world (apparently being natural is immoral), and across the rest of the 'civilised' world girls are just sprayed with a virtual acid which burns and scars nearly as brutally.

    Boys are conditioned to despise girls who are honest and respect girls who are deceitful and manipulative. The marketplace has been corrupted and girls imagine they're exploiting it, demanding to be treated Right and finding plenty of bidding action.

    When the treating Right has waned, there are a billion mothers who Know Best. They raise their children with love and lies because that's all they know.

    The researchers of this study cannot even distinguish between EQ and social skills.

    We have the IQs to destroy OR save the world.

    We have the EQs to make our self-destruction INEVITABLE.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. TonyTrenton 02:31 AM 1/29/13

    Before we discuss 'Intelligence'. We need a definition.

    I.Q. is a measure of the ability to learn relative to time.

    Having a high I.Q. doesn't make you smart.

    I have met a lot of highly intelligent idiots in my life.

    How you use your ability to learn determines how smart you are.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. TonyTrenton in reply to goscuter1 02:50 AM 1/29/13

    Do you realize that your idea of feeding all of humanity is not just short sighted. It is ridiculous in the extreme and totally unsustainable.

    The world population has reached +- 7 billion. without feeding everybody.

    In extension. Women who have the availability of contraception must be made aware that bringing other people into the world to suffer because of their selfish base desires. Is not a right. But an enormous responsibility for all the thoughts, feelings and actions of their offspring.

    Women have the ultimate control and therefore the responsibility.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. jtdwyer in reply to TonyTrenton 07:32 PM 1/29/13

    Your attributing responsibility and blame for overpopulation is utter nonsense. In most of the world, especially those populations with the greatest past and projected growth rates, women have very little control over their sexual and reproductive activities - it is men who have control over women's 'choices'. It is the demands of men's "base desires" that are imposed on women! Secondarily, it is religious policies that often influence population growth rates.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  9. 9. jtdwyer in reply to TonyTrenton 07:33 PM 1/29/13

    Your attributing responsibility and blame for overpopulation is utter nonsense. In most of the world, especially those populations with the greatest past and projected growth rates, women have very little control over their sexual and reproductive activities - it is men who have control over women's 'choices'. It is the demands of men's "base desires" that are imposed on women! Secondarily, it is religious policies that often influence population growth rates.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  10. 10. Joseph C Moore, Cpo USN Ret in reply to jtdwyer 01:02 PM 1/30/13

    I believe you meant "incredible". Incredulous means having a disbelief, while, incredible means beyond belief (as, I am incredulous at your pronouncements, they are not credible).

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  11. 11. Merrywheels 01:19 PM 1/30/13

    Now I know how a friend could emotionally cope with two TBIs, cancer four times, the loss of a child, and a childabuse survivor. We all marvel at this person, but one thing we noticed, when things go wrong and we often struggle to deal with whatever it is, this person pulls back, stating once, "waiting for the universe to catch up."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  12. 12. jtdwyer in reply to Joseph C Moore, Cpo USN Ret 01:53 PM 1/30/13

    I think the rest of my comment supported my assertion that the generalized results were incredulous.

    This study merely established that brain damage can affect both emotional intelligence and IQ. This may be important research for those suffering with brain injuries, but does nothing to establish a correlation between emotional intelligence and general intelligence in individuals without brain injury.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

Follow Us:

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American MIND

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Emotional Smarts Tied to General IQ

X
Scientific American Mind

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X