EPA's New Pesticide Testing Is Outdated

In its search for endocrine-disrupting chemicals, the agency should turn to new scientists, says an advocate














Share on Tumblr

One of the chemicals on EPA’s list, atrazine, is a herbicide reported in aquatic and drinking water systems across the USA. It will likely pass this battery of tests with flying colors even though it feminizes laboratory animals and frogs by turning on the enzyme that converts testosterone to estrogen.  EPA is proposing an assay to detect chemicals that can block that enzyme, but it cannot detect chemicals that turn it on.

EPA’s testing program is full of voids, addressing only a segment of the organs, tissues, and systems that make up the endocrine system. It will not detect chemicals that can alter development and function of the pancreas, and its hormone, insulin, which could lead to diabetes and obesity. It also will not detect chemicals that alter how the brain is constructed and programmed that can undermine intelligence and behavior. An insecticide--like chlorpyrifos, which alters how brains develop and leads to measurable changes in behavior and function later in life--will probably not be picked up by the proposed tests.

In light of the increasing pandemics and the new administration’s willingness to seek and make 180 degree changes, the time is ripe to move forward and let the scientists who understand the complexity of the endocrine system step in. Give these scientists, who have proven that they can think outside the box and inside the womb, the opportunity and wherewithal to design a couple of comprehensive, multi-organ assays to detect the most sensitive alterations in embryonic and fetal development and function. These assays that will ultimately reduce the use of thousands of animals and make up for the time lost over the past decade. Thanks to the internet, a rich set of data about endocrine disruption research is available, and with teleconferencing, scientists no longer have to leave their labs and travel long distances to communicate in large group sessions. These scientists are on the verge of developing protocols that will look nothing like what was done in the past to address a serious global health problem.   

Colborn is the founder and president of TEDX, The Endocrine Disruption Exchange, and co-author of Our Stolen Future.

This article originally ran at Environmental Health News, a news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.


4 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. slickrok 10:17 AM 4/28/09

    They are using the WRONG RATS too.....the strain with proven resistance to these types of effects......

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. slickrok 10:35 AM 4/28/09

    http://discovermagazine.com/2009/feb/22-very-tough-rat-big-risk-human-health

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. des 03:30 PM 4/28/09

    Atrazine is a member of triazine family, Are all triazines implicated?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. jane33w 06:53 AM 4/25/10

    As long as we don't blame the Obama administration for the lies and corruption of the W. Bush administration. When this article was written, AT BEST the EPA had not had a chance to even begin to recover from the years of W. damage. Extra telling is that Steve Johnson the last Bush Administrator of EPA under rose through the ranks of the EPA Pesticides and Toxics office... he knew exactly what EPA was doing. Yet here we are.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital
  SA Digital

Email this Article

EPA's New Pesticide Testing Is Outdated

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X