As we've seen, however, the brain has many ways to make good on our expectations, both good and bad. In response to a clinician's promise, the brain releases painkillers as strong as morphine. Anxiety short-circuits anticipation and the athlete's worst fears come true. The embodied expectations of looking powerful can send our hormones racing. As Ader's saccharin-slurping rats demonstrated, the immune system can be ratcheted up and down without a word being said.
We saw in Chapters 6 and 8 how readily we take cues for our own behavior from watching others. Why couldn't placebo and nocebo effects spread socially, too? In 2007, for a rare lab study of nocebo contagion, psychologists at the University of Hull (UK) somehow recruited 120 people to test "individual reactions to environmental substances." The researchers gave everybody an inhaler that supposedly contained a toxin known to cause headaches, nausea, itchy skin, and drowsiness. In reality, the inhalers contained nothing but plain old air.
Each subject was paired with another subject who was actually an actor in cahoots with the researchers. Sometimes the actor would show symptoms, either by answering the researchers' questions or by wincing, yawning, or throat clearing, and so on. In other cases, they'd stay symptom free.
Isolated in a room, the pairs of participants were told to inhale the toxin and then to hold their breath for three seconds. Over the next hour, a researcher checked in every ten minutes to see how they were feeling. They always spoke to the confederate first, and asked about the four symptoms mentioned up front and four other unexpected symptoms— watery eyes, scratchy throat, tightening chest, and difficulty breathing. Subjects whose partners displayed phony symptoms felt sicker and reported significantly more symptoms than subjects whose partners seemed unaffected by the "toxin."
Placebos can also be contagious, as Benedetti and his colleague Luana Colloca demonstrated in 2009. Subjects enduring painful electric shocks to their hand experienced placebo pain relief when a green light on the machine delivering the shocks was illuminated and felt more pain when the light was red. They weren't told what these lights meant —in reality, they meant nothing— but they'd watched another subject, actually a confederate of the researchers, faking his way through the red and green light shocks. Notably, the placebo pain relief was much stronger for these folks than it was for another group of subjects who were told up front what the lights meant but were given no demonstration.



See what we're tweeting about


3 Comments
Add CommentSimply because an agent is not found, *does not* actually prove none is extant. Viruses, for example, are difficult to detect, and prions are nearly impossible; unknown chemicals can be similarly difficult.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisI'd like to know why the author of this piece has not mentioned the ergotamine-poisoning explanation for the Saint Vitus' Dance victims. Not only are the symptoms reasonably congruent (and also susceptible to suggestion from others AND the victims' own expectations), rye ergot is also endemic in the poor weather conditions at the time.
While this book has an interesting take on possible causes, from what's presented here, it has precious little evidence for its positions.
Bozobub,
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisErgot poisoning is a highly credible explanation for Saint Vitus Dance.
Not only would the harsh weather have made fungal infection of rye more likely, but crop failures would make grain scarcer. Ergot infection of rye is typically pretty easy to notice, due to the distinctive purple bodies;http://www.botany.hawaii.edu/faculty/wong/BOT135/ErgotonRye.gif
Most Millers would apparently discard obviously ergotised rye, (even though they didn't know what the fungus was). However when grain was scarce it was often milled into flour used for the cheapest loaves of bread.
http://bioweb.uwlax.edu/bio203/2011/miedema_kait/diseases.htm
.
Dr Jane.
I'm from a town about 30kms south of Strasbourg. The extent of the account of the mal effects of dancing is largely dismissed by historians. It grew to these almost mythological proportions long after the so-called event.
Reply | Report Abuse | Link to thisContrary to the cliche, often where there is smoke there is no fire. Especially in non-scientific anecdotal accounts.