Hell off Earth: Blustery Exoplanet Charted in 2-D for First Time

Astronomers have made a crude two-dimensional thermal map of an extrasolar world they cannot yet see, confirming that violent winds rapidly whip around the planet















Share on Tumblr

Low-resolution two-dimensional map of an exoplanet

HOT STUFF: As exoplanet HD 189733 b is eclipsed by its host star, astronomers can track how much the observed infrared radiation diminishes, and hence how much comes from individual curved bands of the planet. Repeating the process as HD 189733 b reemerges from behind the star produces a rough two-dimensional sketch [bottom] of the planet's thermal emission. A complementary analysis of the eclipse data yields a similar map [top]. Image: CARL MAJEAU, ERIC AGOL

A mere 60 light-years away, orbiting an orangish star called HD 189733, is a world an Earthling would not want to visit. The planet is a gas giant, like Jupiter or Saturn, but unlike those familiar worlds this one hugs tightly to its host star, orbiting at about one thirtieth the distance at which Earth circles the sun. The exoplanet, labeled HD 189733 b by astronomical convention, stays mighty toasty under its astronomical broiler, with temperatures upward of 900 degrees Celsius.

Thanks to a new study, any hypothetical unfortunates forced to visit HD 189733 b will know which part of the planet is the most infernal. A trio of researchers at the University of Washington in Seattle (U.W.), Columbia University and Northwestern University has produced a thermal map of the planet's atmosphere in both latitude and longitude. Their research appears in the March 10 The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

The map is somewhat crude, but that is no surprise given that HD 189733 b cannot even be seen in the conventional sense. As is the case for most of the 750-plus exoplanets that astronomers have identified to date, its presence and properties are inferred from indirect observations—for instance, by monitoring how much starlight the planet blocks when passing in front of its parent star.

Five years ago, astronomers used the Spitzer Space Telescope to chart the longitudinal difference in thermal emission from HD 189733 b—the dayside versus the nightside—by monitoring the infrared radiation coming from both the star and the planet. By tracking changes as the planet moved through its orbit, the researchers were able to extract not only how much infrared radiation the planet emitted, but also how much came from individual longitudinal bands of the body.

HD 189733 b is tidally locked, meaning that the same hemisphere faces the star at all times, much the same way that the same side of the moon always faces Earth. "After watching it for half an orbit, then we've gotten to see all of its sides," says Eric Agol, a U.W. astrophysicist who contributed both to the 2007 mapping effort and the latest study. "But we don't know where the light is coming from as a function of latitude."

To get a two-dimensional picture, Agol and his colleagues used Spitzer to track HD 189733 b as the planet disappeared behind its star, and then as it reemerged. Because those so-called secondary eclipses occur high on the face of the star, the edge of the star blots out the planet at an angle. That allowed Agol and his colleagues to estimate the thermal brightness of various slanted bands of the planet as HD 189733 b passed behind the star, and as the planet reemerged. "As the planet is passing behind the star, you know how much of the planet should have disappeared," Agol says. "You can compare that to how much flux disappears in that time, and we then can combine that to make a two-dimensional picture of the planet."

In the picture gleaned from seven secondary eclipses, the planet was confirmed to have a significant hot spot, as would be expected on the dayside, under the continuous glare of the star. But that hot spot is shifted along the equator just a bit, perhaps because of the fierce winds that are expected to exist there. Climate models of HD 189733 b have predicted that winds of several kilometers per second may race along the equator. "One hallmark of that band of wind is that the hot spot shouldn't be directly at the substellar point, at high noon," says planetary astronomer Heather Knutson of the California Institute of Technology, who did not contribute to the new study. "That hot gas actually gets carried a little bit downwind."



Rights & Permissions

5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. Retpro1 02:24 PM 2/27/12

    I don't think I'll make any travel reservations!

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. David Russell 07:13 PM 2/27/12

    I don't think people realize that we are very lucky to be in the sweet spot, and have a large moon. I really think that the collision that caused the moon was responsible for a blow off of CO2 which would have left us like Venus and the resulting rain of heavier metals back to earth created the magnetic field by enhancing the core and angular momentum. This means that if we are looking for places intelligent life like us can exist the odds are much higher against it. On another note though the discovery of extremeophiles means that cellular life could be quite prevalent and perhaps even more complex life approaching Squids and Octopi. Whether a back bone/spinal chord type creature could exist is where I think the moon is what gave us a better chance of evolving in that direction.

    It is interesting because only now is science starting to relate the benefit the moon provides to our evolution and I still see a lot of missing pieces especially the part of the loss of CO2 and the additional iron and nickle that makes up our core.

    It is nice to know that there are other planets but if you think about it the way stars (especially newer stars) are made it stands to reason that there would be material left over to ac-create into planets and planetoids. With the discovery of the Oort Cloud we are just starting to realize that the suns reach is roughly 1 light year which is also interesting. I wonder if the 2 million light year distance between Andromeda and the Milkyway means much. It is a shame we will miss the collision in 2 billion years. The sky filling more and more with another galaxy would be a sight to see.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Quinn the Eskimo 02:07 AM 3/2/12

    A mere 60 light years away. So, how far is that at our go-to-the-moon speed of 35,000?

    Nice discussion. Impracticable destination. Wonderful hypothesis. What if these guys are *wrong*?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. frankboase 08:44 AM 3/2/12

    Hi Quinn, well would it be catastrophic if they were?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. David Russell in reply to Quinn the Eskimo 04:07 PM 3/2/12

    If we would have gone with Project Orion still 600 years. I wonder who will be in charge of the earth by then? It is good that the closest stars are far away from us for them and for us. Even getting a message back and forth is problematic at this point but with entanglement possibilities and non interfering observation we may some day overcome that. The diamond entanglement experiment a few months ago leaves some interesting doors to open.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Hell off Earth: Blustery Exoplanet Charted in 2-D for First Time

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X