The Exploration of the Moon

The successful mission of Apollo 11 opens an epoch of planned lunar exploration. What questions should this exploration seek to answer, and what areas of the moon should be visited to best confront them?















Share on Tumblr


The location of the proposed landing site at the boundary between a highland and a mare provides the opportunity for another promising investigation. Deployment of a multiple-axis seismometer and recording of seismic waves from different directions should reveal something about any deep structural differences between the maria and the highlands. Thus, one might answer the question of whether or not the maria and highlands are analogous to the oceans and continents on the earth, which show major structural differences.

The Long Traverse
After the early fixed-station landings at a wide variety of lunar sites some form of long-range, mobile surface exploration will be necessary to overcome the limitations of men on foot. The answer lies in vehicular traverses, which would make it possible to study cross-country variations on the moon and so form the bridge between the intensive observations that can be made in the vicinity of a landing site and the extensive averaging observations that can be made from orbit. The technique that is attracting particular interest at present is called the dual-mode lunar surface roving vehicle system. The term dual mode refers to the fact that the vehicle can be used by the astronauts while they are working on the lunar surface and can be operated remotely from the earth after they depart. The present plan entails two separate lunar landings 500 kilometers apart at sites chosen to maximize the amount of information returned from the unmanned, automatic traverse.

Such an operation would proceed as follows. Near the end of surface activities in the first landing the men would start their unmanned vehicle on an automatic traverse. The vehicle, guided from the earth, would move across the moon toward a distant point that is within the second landing area. There the men participating in the second landing would meet the vehicle several months after it had started its journey. During its traverse the vehicle would collect samples of rock, transmit television pictures and conduct geophysical experiments yielding data that would be transmitted to the earth by telemetry. After the rocks had been retrieved by the astronauts at the second site the vehicle could be used by them in the exploration of that site. If the vehicle was still in satisfactory condition, they could start it on another long traverse.

A typical traverse might go from Rima Hadley into Mare Imbrium and thence into Mare Serenitatis. Along the way it would provide continuous profiles of the variations in gravity, magnetic and electric fields and depths of the surface layer. This particular traverse crosses one of the largest of the mascon areas and would cover enough ground to explore the phenomenon adequately with geophysical techniques.

The continuous monitoring of gravity along the traverse would provide information on the regional isostatic balance on the moon, that is, whether the higher topographic features are compensated by a deficiency of mass below them or whether they represent loads on the surface. An answer to this question would tell a great deal about the mechanism of formation of such features. Gravity information will also yield clues about the maximum depth of variations in density. If the moon has a crust analogous to the earth's, how does it vary between the lunar highlands near Rima Hadley and the center of the Imbrium basin?

The value of gravity measurements is increased if they can be combined with seismic information. Seismic measurements could be expected to resolve details of any layering in the lunar substrata. Along the traverse we have been describing a properly executed seismic experiment would quickly reveal the presence of giant iron asteroids buried in the mascons.



5 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. hotblack 07:38 PM 7/16/09

    The Apollo missions were truly 50 years ahead of their time. 50 years societally & technologically. We ought still to look back at what our ancestors achieved, with the resources at hand, and the will in mind, in awe.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. ericmmcdonald 12:28 AM 7/17/09

    I disagree hotblack, the Apollo missions were 7-10 behind the times. If Wernher von Braun was given the opportunity earlier, we would have gotten to the moon by 1959-62. The German scientist was way beyond his time. In one word "Brilliant". Why doesn't Nasa have any of these guys around?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. doron in reply to ericmmcdonald 04:09 AM 7/21/09

    Perhaps technology. But Werner Von Braun as a Nazi was societally 1000s of years behind. Better to not have achieved the moon landing and other technological goals than be a Nazi

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. QuantumQualifax 02:01 AM 6/23/10

    doron, surely you must be aware that Von Braun was a reluctant Nazi. He earned the enmity of his superiors on several occasions because of his outspoken vision of rocket-enabled space travel and exploration, rather than rocket-enabled world domination. Von Braun was not enthusiastic about the Nazis or the war. This characteristic almost cost him his life. Viewing the past through the lense of the present affords many opportunities to wax morally superior to one's ancestors. The moon landings were a culmination of Von Braun's inspired vision of human progress, and had nothing to do with the Nazi Party. Perhaps you had better get your own house in order, doron - before you ask the entire human race to discard any dreams of reaching beyond, for fear of disturbing a tree or a slumbering faun.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. QuantumQualifax 02:17 AM 6/23/10

    hotblack - Do you know how much I despise those who state that "so-and-so was ahead of their time" simply because the ball got dropped later on? Apollo was firmly of its time. The moon mission could have been completed earlier than 1969 had it not been for delays. Saying that Apollo was 50 years ahead of its time is the same as saying its OK that we're currently doing nothing of consequence in space. I vehemently disagree with this state of affairs. I will add, hotblack, that using your logic, Apollo wasn't just 50 years ahead of its time. If the Chinese make it to the moon by 2020, Apollo will be officially 61 years ahead of its time. If you ignore the Chinese and just count NASA, well... you might have to wait a pretty long time to find out. They'll probably not go their again. We entered our long decline a while back.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

The Exploration of the Moon

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X