Farm Pesticides Linked to Skin Cancer

Sun exposure has always been considered the driving force behind rising rates of melanoma. But new research suggests that repeated, long-term use of pesticides may be an important factor, too















Share on Tumblr



Having red hair increased the workers’ skin cancer risk by nearly four times, according to the study. People with fair skin are more likely to be sunburned, which can lead to melanoma. Obesity also was linked to an increased risk, for unknown reasons.

The researchers took the workers’ survey responses about safety equipment into account when estimating doses.

All pesticides in the study are labeled with handling instructions and some can only be applied and mixed by licensed applicators, who receive ongoing training to handle and mix chemicals. The minimum recommended safety equipment is long pants, long sleeves, boots and gloves, but more personal protective equipment can be required depending on the chemical.

“What kind of safety equipment they need to wear is written on each label,” said Kristine Schaefer, pesticide applicator training specialist at Iowa State University Extension. “People need to follow the label directions or they can be held liable. That is what we preach.”

But Schaefer said all workers don’t follow the rules. “We talk about it in our training all the time to try to get the message across,” she said.
 
Previous research in Europe and the United States also has linked long-term pesticide exposure to increased melanoma risks. In Europe, researchers found that people who used pesticides indoors more than four times a year had twice the melanoma rate of people who used less.

The pesticides in the study are approved for use by the Environmental Protection Agency, and according to Dale Kemery, EPA press officer, they were all reviewed in 2008. Benomyl and ethyl parathion were voluntarily canceled as part of that process. Review of pesticides occurs at least every 15 years.

This article originally ran at Environmental Health News, a news source published by Environmental Health Sciences, a nonprofit media company.

 



3 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. bertwindon 03:47 PM 3/31/10

    "... may be another important source of melanoma .."
    I hope I am not alone when I say that I would much prefer "significant" to "important" here.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. always thinking 04:26 PM 4/1/10

    I bet that the link has to do with inflammation - that the people exposed to the pesticides who developed melanoma showed greater skin reactivity to the pesticides or had other symptoms of inflammation related problems. I'd be interested in hearing whether or not levels of inflammation relative to pesticide exposure and development of melanoma were studied.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Jehnavi 12:57 AM 2/14/11

    Carbaryl, a pesticide linked to cancer identified in the study, was a pesticide active ingredient in popular home and garden Sevin, now annulled the United States for these applications.
    http://www.justcancer.org/skin-cancer.html

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Science Jobs of the Week

Email this Article

Farm Pesticides Linked to Skin Cancer

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X