Fat? No Food for You!

Mississippi lawmakers introduce bill that would ban restaurants from serving portly patrons















Share on Tumblr



NO FAT PEOPLE SERVED HERE: Mississippi legislation would prohibit restaurants there from serving obese customers. Image: iSTOCKPHOTO.com

You're big, bulky—and hungry. So you lumber into a restaurant to get a bite. You scan the menu for a tasty meal, but when it comes time to order the waiter refuses to serve you. The reason? You're too fat. Sound outrageous? You may want to steer clear of Mississippi, where legislation was recently introduced that would ban restaurants from serving proportion-challenged patrons.

We kid you not. The controversial measure (state House Bill 282) would prohibit eateries from serving food to "any person who is obese based on criteria prescribed by the state health department." The department would monitor compliance and have the power to revoke violators' permits. (Pity the poor waiter with the thankless task of denying corpulent customers service, leaving them with the humiliating dilemma of either twiddling their thumbs as their less hefty chums chow down or slinking (storming?) out and slogging to a supermarket or over the state line for sustenance.)

Sponsors of the legislation insist that it was designed to spark discussion on ways to get a handle on obesity: More than 30 percent of Mississippi's adults are considered obese, giving the Magnolia State--where fried chicken and other greasy fare rule--the distinction of being the nation's first in fatness, according to a 2007 study by the Trust for America's Health, a Washington, D.C.–based research group that focuses on disease prevention.

"I was trying to shed a little light on the number one health problem in Mississippi," co-sponsor Republican Rep. John Read of Gautier, a former pharmaceutical company sales representative, told the Associated Press, acknowledging that at five feet, 11 inches (1.8 meters) and 230 pounds (104 kilograms), he might get the restaurant boot under his own bill.

People, both chubby and thin, immediately blasted the proposal. Physicians called it insane, saying it would do nothing to help plump patients pare down to healthier weights. The rotund rights lobby agreed, charging that it was discriminatory and arbitrary. "We as Americans have made substantial progress in race and gender relations. Unfortunately, our progress hasn't extended to our country's uneasy relationship with fat people," Paul McAleer, president of the Coalition of Fat Rights Activists, said in a statement.

And the restaurant industry, which stands to lose many a coveted and loyal customer, was beside itself.

"This is the latest example of food cops run amok. Are waiters supposed to carry scales around the restaurant and weigh every customer? Give me a break," J. Justin Wilson, a senior research analyst at The Center for Consumer Freedom, which represents the restaurant and food service industry, said in a statement. "What's next? Will waitresses soon be expected to make sure we eat all our veggies?"

More helpful in the battle of bulge, say critics: programs directed at getting to the core of the problem, such as a law passed in Mississippi last year that requires kids in kindergarten through eighth grade to receive at least 150 minutes of physical education and 45 minutes of health ed instruction weekly; until then, gym had been optional.

But lest you're not a skinny-minny and worry you may starve should you travel to Mississippi—fear not: state Rep. Steve Holland, the Democratic chairman of the House Public Health and Human Services Committee, pronounced the controversial bill "dead on arrival at my desk." In other words, it will never even make it out of committee and onto the floor of the legislature for a vote. "While I appreciate the efforts of my fellow House members to help curb the obesity problem in Mississippi,'' he said, "this is totally the wrong approach.''

That'll teach the (anti-) fat cats to stick their (tape) measures where they don't belong.



8 Comments

Add Comment
View
  1. 1. gsummit 02:02 PM 2/8/08

    The person that wrote this article is an ediot. To say that you should bypass Mississippi because of this proposal would be saying that there is no problem. This proposal was never intended to pass. The person that wrote the bill said it was to draw attention to the problem. Did anyone read his comment?

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  2. 2. Alison Stone 02:17 PM 2/8/08

    What has this country come to? Wonderful article on the ridiculous possible 'legislation' of obesity! What's next?

    Alison Stone

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  3. 3. Steve010101 03:32 PM 2/8/08

    We have taxes on tobacco, why not for junk foods? Government intervention is justified and necessary when we start viewing obesity as a disease and not a lifestyle choice due to a lack of will. Just think of all the other steps the government takes to ensure the publics health. - Steve

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  4. 4. tubarc 07:10 PM 2/8/08

    WE are born naked but laws require us to wear clothes. Someday down the line we will be forced to be fit for our won good even more important than wearing clothes.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  5. 5. Provost 09:47 PM 2/8/08

    This was so predictable I predicted it and told many people this would happen when they harassed me about smoking. Now I have successfully quit smoking and it is going on two years it is fitting that these fat folks now realize what it feels like to have someone else tell you how to live your life.
    So, next time you want to chastise someone for smoking a cigarette perhaps you could instead empathize with them as we all have flaws and we all do our best to live a decent life. Tax the fat, tax the rich, tax the lazy, tax the alcoholics and mentally ill, and sooner or later, we will all be taxed to DEATH.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  6. 6. skinnyfatguy80 01:41 AM 2/9/08

    ok, gsummit. Your stupid cuz you can't spell idiot.
    Anyway, This country has to do something to control our nation from obesity. We all know it is an epidemic, but anything congress tries to pass will anger people. Coalition of Fat Rights Activists??? What the hell will people come up with next. Give me a break. Rights protecting the Fat? "Hey I'm 5' 5" tall and weigh 345lbs. I am big and beautiful...." You should be kicked in the fourhead.
    these words brought to you by the person that says get off your fat @$$ and make a change for goodness sake.

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  7. 7. moo0069 01:31 PM 2/14/08

    I think this is great legislation for people who have little to no self-control. At least, now they have no way of blaming outside factors for them being fat. You're fat because you're lazy and don't want to exercise (exceptions: those on medication with weight gain as a side-effect.)

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
  8. 8. sabian 01:45 PM 5/19/08

    if the state prohibits eateries from serving food to "any person who is obese based on criteria prescribed by the state health department." then they need to would prohibit eateries from not serving food to "any person who is starving and thin based on criteria prescribed by the state health department."

    Reply | Report Abuse | Link to this
Leave this field empty

Add a Comment

You must sign in or register as a ScientificAmerican.com member to submit a comment.
Click one of the buttons below to register using an existing Social Account.

More from Scientific American

See what we're tweeting about

Scientific American Editors

More »

Free Newsletters


Get the best from Scientific American in your inbox

Solve Innovation Challenges

Powered By: Innocentive

  SA Digital

Latest from SA Blog Network

  SA Digital

Email this Article

Fat? No Food for You!

X
Scientific American Magazine

Subscribe Today

Save 66% off the cover price and get a free gift!

Learn More >>

X

Please Log In

Forgot: Password

X

Account Linking

Welcome, . Do you have an existing ScientificAmerican.com account?

Yes, please link my existing account with for quick, secure access.



Forgot Password?

No, I would like to create a new account with my profile information.

Create Account
X

Report Abuse

Are you sure?

X

Institutional Access

It has been identified that the institution you are trying to access this article from has institutional site license access to Scientific American on nature.com. To access this article in its entirety through site license access, click below.

Site license access
X

Error

X

Share this Article

X